ArticleMedicine2020
Application of multiple injections of contrast agent in head and neck CT arteriovenous angiography in children: Study protocol clinical trial (SPIRIT Compliant).
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of PEG-BP-BaYbFJournal of materials chemistry. B · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the application value of multiple injections of contrast agent in head and neck CT arteriovenous angiography in children.
methodsA total of 100 children aged 6 to 7 years who needed head and neck CT arteriovenous angiography were prospectively selected. They were randomly divided into a control group and a research group, with 50 children in each group. The same scanning parameters and reconstruction methods were used. The right median cubital vein was injected intravenously with the contrast agent Omnipaque (350 mg I/ml). For children in the control group, a bolus of undiluted contrast agent (dose was 2 ml/kg, upper limit was 50 ml) was injected 1 time. The arterial phase and vein phase of the head and neck vessels were scanned. For children in the research group, a contrast agent bolus diluted with saline to a concentration of 20% was first injected (dose was 1 ml/kg, upper limit was 25 ml), and then an undiluted contrast agent bolus (dose was 1 ml/kg, upper limit was 25 ml) was injected. Thresholds were used to trigger the scanning of the head and neck arterial phases. The CT image quality of the head and neck arteries and veins, radiation dose and contrast agent dose were compared between the 2 groups.
resultsSubjective evaluation of CT image quality of arteries: there were 47 cases of 4 points and 3 cases of 3 points in the control group and 34 cases of 4 points and 16 cases of 3 points in the research group. Subjective evaluation of CT image quality of veins: there were 47 cases of 4 points and 3 cases of 3 points in the control group and 5 cases of 4 points, 42 cases of 3 points and 3 cases of 2 points in the research group. The CT value of brain arterial vessel enhancement was higher in the control group than the research group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). The CT value of vein enhancement was higher in the control group than the research group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). The X-ray dose in the research group was 51% lower than that in the control group; the contrast agent dose in the research group was 44% lower than that in the control group.
conclusionFor the head and neck enhanced CT examination of children, the method of first bolus injection of 20% diluted contrast agent and later bolus injection of undiluted contrast agent can clearly demonstrate the head and neck arteries and veins one time, reducing the X-ray dose and contrast agent dose, which has clinical practical value in the enhanced CT examination of children with head and neck disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.