ArticleMedicine2020
Efficacy and safety of shenqi compound for the treatment of diabetic macroangiopathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic macroangiopathy is a further complication of diabetes mellitus and is the leading cause of death for diabetic patients. Shenqi compound (SC) is a traditional Chinese medicine formula widely used in the treatment of diabetes and diabetic macroangiopathy. At present, there is only 1 systematic review on SC in the treatment of diabetes. However, no meta-analysis has evaluated the efficacy and safety of SC on diabetic macroangiopathy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Three English database and four Chinese medical databases will be searched from its inception to February 2020. Then 2 methodological trained researchers will screen the qualified articles by reading the title, abstract, and full texts according to an established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The assessment of risk of bias will be conducted by using the Cochrane collaboration's tool. We will conduct meta-analyses for fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PBG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and other outcomes. The heterogeneity of data will be evaluated by Cochrane χ and I tests. We establish 3 hypotheses before the subgroup analysis actually starts: disease status at baseline, duration of intervention, type of concomitant medication. We will conduct sensitivity analysis to evaluate the stability of the results, funnel plot analysis, and Egger test to evaluate the publication bias, and assessment for the quality of evidence by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluate system (GRADE).
resultsThe results will be published at a peer-reviewed journal.
conclusionIn this study, we will systematically evaluate the evidence of SC in the treatment of diabetic macroangiopathy. Our research is supposed to provide evidence-based support for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.