Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32282720›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture and its cotreatment with electronic moxibustion in the treatment of patients with moderate benign prostatic hyperplasia using alpha blocker: Study protocol for an assessor-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial.

Hyo Bin Kim, Young Il Kim, Ju Hyun Jeon, Eunseok Kim, Jin Youp Kim, Ojin Kwon, Young Eun Choi, Changsop Yang, Chang-Hyun Han

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hyo Bin KimDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon.
Young Il KimDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon.
Ju Hyun JeonDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon.
Eunseok KimDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon.
Jin Youp KimDepartment of Clinical Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul.
Ojin KwonClinical Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine.
Young Eun ChoiClinical Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine.
Changsop YangClinical Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine.
Chang-Hyun HanClinical Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine.
Daejeon University · KRKorea Institute of Oriental Medicine · KRKyung Hee University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a medical condition that affects the quality of life by causing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in 40% to 70% of men aged ≥60 years. Medication treatment is primarily recommended for patients with BPH if their symptom score based on the International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS) is above the moderate level. However, electroacupuncture (EA) and electronic moxibustion (EM), one of the most recent complementary and alternative treatments, are suggested as adjuvant treatments in the improvement of LUTS caused by BPH with respect to the limitations of medication treatments, such as side effects or no improvement in LUTS despite treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of EA and its cotreatment with EM for the improvement of LUTS in patients diagnosed with BPH using an alpha blocker but with moderate symptoms on the basis of IPSS. METHODS/

designThis protocol is a 2-arm parallel-design, randomized, controlled assessor-blinded clinical trial. Seventy-eight patients diagnosed with BPH are randomized to one of the following groups: [EA and its cotreatment with EM + alpha blocker group] and [alpha blocker group]. [EA and its cotreatment with EM + alpha blocker group] continues to use the previously prescribed alpha blocker and visits the study institution 3 times a week for 6 weeks to receive the cotreatment of EA and EM. [Alpha blocker group] continues to use the previously prescribed alpha blocker for 6 weeks. To evaluate the effectiveness of the EA and its cotreatment with EM, the followings are measured: total score of the IPSS, IPSS quality of life assessment, EuroQol-Five dimension, maximum and average urinary flow rate (Qmax and Qave), and prostate size at the baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th weeks. The primary effectiveness endpoint measures the average change in the total score of the IPSS at the 6th week. Side effects are recorded at each visit. DISCUSSION: The results of this study are expected to provide useful information on the effectiveness and safety of the EA and its cotreatment with EM for patients with BPH with regard to the improvements in LUTS.

trial registrationClinical Research Information Service of Republic of Korea (CRIS-KCT0004411), October 31, 2019.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-AntagonistsAgedAlgorithmsCombined Modality TherapyElectroacupunctureHumansLower Urinary Tract SymptomsMaleMiddle AgedMoxibustionProstatic HyperplasiaQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRepublic of KoreaSafetyTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic alpha-Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID32282720
PMCPMC7220246
OpenAlexW3015471374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.