Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32282706›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Cytokine Removal in Critically Ill Patients Requiring Surgical Therapy for Infective Endocarditis (RECReATE): An Investigator-initiated Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two Established Clinical Protocols.

Fabian Gisler, Thibaud Spinetti, Gabor Erdoes, Markus M Luedi, Carmen A Pfortmueller, Anna S Messmer, Hansjörg Jenni, Lars Englberger, Joerg C Schefold

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03892174 (Cytokine REmoval in CRitically Ill PAtients Requiring Surgical Therapy for Infective Endocarditis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03892174 narecruitingnot on this map

Cytokine REmoval in CRitically Ill PAtients Requiring Surgical Therapy for Infective Endocarditis (RECReATE) - an Investigator-initiated Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two Established Clinical Protocols

TypeinterventionalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2019 to 2024Enrolled54ConditionsEndocarditis, Sepsis, Septic ShockArmsTreatment protocol with adsorption
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabian GislerDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery.
Thibaud SpinettiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine.
Gabor ErdoesDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Markus M LuediDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Carmen A PfortmuellerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine.
Anna S MessmerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine.
Hansjörg JenniDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery.
Lars EnglbergerDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery.
Joerg C SchefoldDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine.
University Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfective endocarditis (IE) and other severe infections induce significant changes in the immune response in a considerable number of affected patients. Numerous IE patients develop a persistent functional immunological phenotype that can best be characterized by a profound anti-inflammation and/ or functional "anergy." This is pronounced in patients with unresolved infectious foci and was previously referred to as "injury-associated immunosuppression" (IAI). IAI can be assessed by measurement of the monocytic human leukocyte antigen-DR (mHLA-DR) expression, a global functional marker of immune competence. Persistence of IAI is associated with prolonged intensive care unit length of stay, increased secondary infection rates, and death. Immunomodulation to reverse IAI was shown beneficial in early immunostimulatory (randomized controlled) clinical trials.

methodsProspective 1:1 randomized controlled clinical study to compare the course of mHLA-DR in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery for IE. Patients will receive either best standard of care plus cytokine adsorption during surgery while on cardiopulmonary bypass (protocol A) versus best standard of care alone, that is, surgery without cytokine adsorption (protocol B). A total of 54 patients will be recruited and randomized. The primary endpoint is a change in quantitative expression of mHLA-DR (antibodies per cell on CD14+ monocytes/ macrophages, assessed using a quantitative standardized assay) from baseline (preoperation [pre-OP], visit 1) to day 1 post-OP (visit 4). DISCUSSION: This randomized controlled clinical trial (RECReATE) will compare 2 clinical treatment protocols and will investigate whether cytokine adsorption restores monocytic immune competence (reflected by increased mHLA-DR expression) in patients with IE undergoing cardiac surgery.

trial registrationThis protocol was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, under number NCT03892174, first listed on March 27, 2019.

Indexed as

CytokinesEndocarditisHLA-DR AntigensMonocytesSorption DetoxificationClinical ProtocolsHumansIntraoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCytokinesHLA-DR Antigens

Identifiers

PMID32282706
PMCPMC7440054
OpenAlexW3016141822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.