Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32282418›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical psychopharmacology

Treating Opioid Use Disorder With a Monthly Subcutaneous Buprenorphine Depot Injection: 12-Month Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy Analysis.

Anne C Andorn, Barbara R Haight, Sunita Shinde, Paul J Fudala, Yue Zhao, Christian Heidbreder, Susan M Learned, Norma Lynn Fox, Vijay R Nadipelli, David Hassman and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical psychopharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Negative allosteric modulation of CBPharmacological research · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne C AndornFrom Indivior Inc., North Chesterfield, VA.
Barbara R HaightFrom Indivior Inc., North Chesterfield, VA.
Sunita ShindeFrom Indivior Inc., North Chesterfield, VA.
Paul J FudalaFrom Indivior Inc., North Chesterfield, VA.
Yue ZhaoFrom Indivior Inc., North Chesterfield, VA.
Christian HeidbrederFrom Indivior Inc., North Chesterfield, VA.
Susan M LearnedFrom Indivior Inc., North Chesterfield, VA.
Norma Lynn FoxFrom Indivior Inc., North Chesterfield, VA.
Vijay R NadipelliFrom Indivior Inc., North Chesterfield, VA.
David HassmanComprehensive Clinical Research, Berlin, NJ.
Daniel RutrickAdams Clinical, Watertown, MA.
Indivior (United States) · USComprehensive Clinical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBUP-XR (RBP-6000 or SUBLOCADE) is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved subcutaneously administered monthly extended-release buprenorphine medication for the treatment of moderate or severe opioid use disorder. The primary objective of this phase III study was to assess the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of BUP-XR.

methodsThis open-label multicenter study in adults with moderate or severe opioid use disorder enrolled 257 participants from a previously conducted placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study (rollover group) and 412 de novo participants not previously treated with BUP-XR. Participants received an initial injection of BUP-XR 300 mg and subsequent monthly 300 mg or 100 mg flexible doses. By study end, participants received up to 12 injections.

resultsOverall, 66.8% of participants reported more than 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Injection-site TEAEs (13.2% of participants) were mostly mild or moderate in severity. There were no clinically meaningful changes in safety assessments. An integrated analysis of the double-blind and open-label study participants showed that the incidence of TEAEs, including injection-site TEAEs, was lower in the second 6 months of treatment versus the first 6 months. After 12 months of treatment, 61.5% of the rollover participants and 75.8% of the de novo participants were abstinent. Retention rates after 12 months were 50.6% for the participants who initiated BUP-XR in the double-blind study and 50.5% for de novo participants.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the clinical benefits and acceptable safety profile of BUP-XR demonstrated in the 6-month double-blind study are sustained over a 12-month open-label study, with lower incidence of TEAEs in the second 6 months of treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineSublocade

Identifiers

PMID32282418
PMCPMC7188268
OpenAlexW3015322623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.