Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32282305›Full record

SynthesisCurrent neuropharmacology2020

What About Drug Checking? Systematic Review and Netnographic Analysis of Social Media.

Amira Guirguis, Isma Moosa, Rosalind Gittins, Fabrizio Schifano

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current neuropharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amira GuirguisSwansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Sciences 2, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, Australia
Isma MoosaDepartment of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hillside House AL10 9AB, UK
Rosalind GittinsHumankind Charity, Inspiration House, Unit 22 Bowburn North Industrial Estate, DH6 5PF, UK
Fabrizio SchifanoUniversity of Hertfordshire, Psychopharmacology, Drug Misuse and Novel Psychoactive Substances Research Unit, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hillside House AL10 9AB, UK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug checking services have been operating worldwide as a harm reduction tool in places like festivals and night clubs. A systematic review and netnographic analysis were conducted to explore the public's perception of drug checking. Although public perceptions of drug checking had not previously been evaluated in the literature, some positive and negative perceptions were captured. From twitter, a total of 1316 tweets were initially identified. Following the removal of irrelevant tweets, 235 relevant tweets were identified, of which about 95% (n = 223) tweets were in favour, and about 5% (n = 12) were not in favour of drug checking as a harm reduction intervention. Tweets perceived the service as part of effective law reform, public health intervention that serves in raising awareness and countering the role of the internet, initiative to reduce drug related harms and/ or potentially deaths, help in identifying Novel drug trends related to drugs, enabling a scientific basis to capture data, reducing harm from risky drugs or risky consumption, reducing the economic and social burden on society and preventing young people from having criminal records and punitive fines. Drug checking was perceived to support engagement with treatment services and support individuals in making more informed decisions. Tweets against drug checking focussed on the concerns over the quality of drug checking, particularly with false-positive results, which may lead to punitive outcomes, discrimination, and prejudice. The present study showed that twitter can be a useful platform to capture people's perceptions of drug checking.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsSocial MediaAdolescentAdultHumansSubstance-Related DisordersYoung AdultIllicit DrugsDrug checkingdrug screeningdrug testingharm reductionpill testingtwitter

Identifiers

PMID32282305
PMCPMC7709144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.