ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2020
Degradable Poly(Methyl Methacrylate)-co-Methacrylic Acid Nanoparticles for Controlled Delivery of Growth Factors for Bone Regeneration.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomaterials in tissue repair and regeneration: key insights from extracellular matrix biology.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Review
- The Delivery and Activation of Growth Factors Using Nanomaterials for Bone Repair.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Scaffold-based tissue engineering strategies for soft-hard interface regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Review
- Broad-Spectrum Theranostics and Biomedical Application of Functionalized Nanomaterials.Polymers · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone tissue engineering strategies have been developed to address the limitations of the current gold standard treatment options for bone-related disorders. These systems consist of an engineered scaffold that mimics the extracellular matrix and provides an architecture to guide the natural bone regeneration process, and incorporated growth factors that enhance cell recruitment and ingress into the scaffold and promote the osteogenic differentiation of stem cells and angiogenesis. In particular, the osteogenic growth factor bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) has been widely studied as a potent agent to improve bone regeneration. A key challenge in growth factor delivery is that the growth factors must reach their target sites without losing bioactivity and remain in the location for an extended period to effectively aid in the formation of new bone. Protein incorporation into nanoparticles can both protect protein bioactivity and enable its sustained release. In this study, a poly(methyl methacrylate-co-methacrylic acid) nanoparticle-based system was synthesized incorporating a custom poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate crosslinker. It was demonstrated that the nanoparticle degradation rate can be controlled by tuning the number of hydrolytically degradable ester units along the crosslinker. We also showed that the nanoparticles had high affinity for a model protein for BMP-2, and optimal conditions for maximum protein loading efficiency were elucidated. Ultimately, the proposed system and its high degree of tunability can be applied to a wide range of growth factors and tissue engineering applications. Impact Statement In this study, we developed a novel method of synthesizing nanoparticles with tunable degradation rates through the incorporation of a custom synthesized, hydrolytically degradable crosslinker. In addition, we demonstrated the affinity of the synthesized nanoparticles for a model protein for bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2). The tunability of these nanoparticles can be used to develop complex tissue engineering systems, for example, for the delivery of multiple growth factors involved at different stages of the bone regeneration process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.