Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32281981›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2020

Assessment of Acute Wound Healing using the Dorsal Subcutaneous Polyvinyl Alcohol Sponge Implantation and Excisional Tail Skin Wound Models.

Meredith J Crane, William L Henry, Holly L Tran, Jorge E Albina, Amanda M Jamieson

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Assessing Animal Models to Study Impaired and Chronic Wounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meredith J CraneDepartment of Molecular Microbiology & Immunology, Brown University.
William L HenryDepartment of Molecular Microbiology & Immunology, Brown University.
Holly L TranDepartment of Molecular Microbiology & Immunology, Brown University.
Jorge E AlbinaDivision of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University.
Amanda M JamiesonDepartment of Molecular Microbiology & Immunology, Brown University; amanda_jamieson@brown.edu.
John Brown University · USRhode Island Hospital · US

Funding

TRAINING IN ENVIRONMENTAL PATHOLOGYT32ES007272 · NIEHS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ZHITKOVICH, ANATOLY · 1992 to 2021
$7.5M
Influence of the lung microbiome on macrophage responses to lung damageR01HL126887 · NHLBI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI JAMIESON, AMANDA M · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126887NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing is a complex process that requires the orderly progression of inflammation, granulation tissue formation, fibrosis, and resolution. Murine models provide valuable mechanistic insight into these processes; however, no single model fully addresses all aspects of the wound healing response. Instead, it is ideal to use multiple models to address the different aspects of wound healing. Here, two different methods that address diverse aspects of the wound healing response are described. In the first model, polyvinyl alcohol sponges are subcutaneously implanted along the mouse dorsum. Following sponge retrieval, cells can be isolated by mechanical disruption, and fluids can be extracted by centrifugation, thus allowing for a detailed characterization of cellular and cytokine responses in the acute wound environment. A limitation of this model is the inability to assess the rate of wound closure. For this, a tail skin excision model is utilized. In this model, a 10 mm x 3 mm rectangular piece of tail skin is excised along the dorsal surface, near the base of the tail. This model can be easily photographed for planimetric analysis to determine healing rates and can be excised for histological analysis. Both described methods can be utilized in genetically altered mouse strains, or in conjunction with models of comorbid conditions, such as diabetes, aging, or secondary infection, in order to elucidate wound healing mechanisms.

Indexed as

BandagesProstheses and ImplantsWound HealingAcute DiseaseAnimalsCell SeparationDisease Models, AnimalInflammationMaleMice, Inbred C57BLPolyvinyl AlcoholSkinSubcutaneous TissueTailPolyvinyl Alcohol

Identifiers

PMID32281981
PMCPMC7281859
OpenAlexW3013941178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.