Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32281881›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on pharmacotherapy2020

Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of anorexia nervosa - too much for one drug?

Guido K W Frank

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Neural circuits regulating activity-based anorexia.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  7. Recovery From Anorexia Nervosa: A Concept Analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Guido K W FrankUCSD Eating Disorder Center for Treatment and Research, University of California San Diego , San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

Neural Effects of Negative Affect on Food Choices and Reward Processing In Individuals with Binge Eating EpisodesR01MH112681 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FRANK, GUIDO KW · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
Taste reward circuits and prediction error define eating disorder psychopathologyR01MH103436 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STODDARD, JOEL JOHNSON · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Brain Reward Circuits and Computational Modeling in Adolescent Anorexia NervosaR01MH096777 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FRANK, GUIDO KW · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
Toward understanding dopamine receptor contributions to prediction error and reversal learning in anorexia nervosaR21MH120475 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FRANK, GUIDO KW · 2019 to 2020
$433k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096777NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103436NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112681NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH120475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnorexia nervosa is a severe psychiatric illness and no medication has been approved for its treatment. This lack of biological treatments requires the development of new directions for pharmacological research. AREAS COVERED: There is modest but emerging evidence that dopamine D2 and serotonin 1A and 2A receptor agonistic and antagonist medication might be beneficial for weight gain, although the underlying mechanisms are uncertain. Improving quality of life including treating comorbid conditions is an additional important outcome measure, but this has not been well researched. Biological and psychological risk factors together with neurobiological alterations during the illness maintain the disorder 's pathophysiology. Neuroscience research can be used to understand those interactions and advance the research agenda. The authors discuss the above as well as give perspectives on future research. EXPERT OPINION: If a multidisciplinary approach that includes evidence-based psychotherapy shows unsatisfactory success in weight normalization and cognitive-emotional recovery, then more experimental treatments that are safe and have indicated treatment effectiveness should be tried to augment treatment. Identification and treatment of comorbid conditions to improve quality of life of the patient should also be part of the treatment regimen, even if the effect on weight gain is uncertain.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnorexia NervosaFemaleHumansQuality of LifeYoung AdultAnorexia nervosainnovationmedicationtreatment

Identifiers

PMID32281881
PMCPMC7491209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.