Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32281541›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Effects of the ACT OUT! Social Issue Theater Program on Social-Emotional Competence and Bullying in Youth and Adolescents: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jon Agley, Wasantha Jayawardene, Mikyoung Jun, Daniel L Agley, Ruth Gassman, Steve Sussman, Yunyu Xiao, Stephanie L Dickinson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04097496 (Multi-Site Cluster, Randomized Proof of Concept Trial to Study the Effects of the ACT OUT! Social Issue Theater Program on Social-Emotional Competence and Bullying in Youth and Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04097496 naterminatednot on this map

Multi-Site Cluster, Randomized Proof of Concept Trial to Study the Effects of the ACT OUT! Social Issue Theater Program on Social-Emotional Competence and Bullying in Youth and Adolescents

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled1,537ConditionsSocial Competence, BullyingArmsAct Out! Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jon AgleyPrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-8850
Wasantha JayawardenePrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8798-0894
Mikyoung JunPrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2671-5306
Daniel L AgleyPrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0377-8729
Ruth GassmanPrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-7320
Steve SussmanDepartments of Preventive Medicine and Psychology, and School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6778-9718
Yunyu XiaoSilver School of Social Work, New York University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0479-1781
Stephanie L DickinsonBiostatistics Consulting Center, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2998-4467
Indiana University Bloomington · USNew York University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudents in the United States spend a meaningful portion of their developmental lives in school. In recent years, researchers and educators have begun to focus explicitly on social and emotional learning (SEL) in the school setting. Initial evidence from meta-analyses suggests that curricula designed to promote SEL likely produce benefits in terms of social-emotional competence (SEC) and numerous related behavioral and affective outcomes. At the same time, there are often barriers to implementing such curricula as intended, and some researchers have questioned the strength of the evaluation data from SEL programs. As part of the effort to improve programming in SEL, this paper describes the protocol for a cluster randomized trial of the ACT OUT! Social Issue Theater program, a brief psychodramatic intervention to build SEC and reduce bullying behavior in students.

objectiveThe objective of this trial is to examine if a short dose of interactive psychodrama can affect SEC metrics and bullying experiences in schoolchildren in either the short (2-week) or medium (6-month) term.

methodsThe ACT OUT! trial is a cluster randomized superiority trial with 2 parallel groups. The unit of measurement is the student, and the unit of randomization is the classroom. For each grade (fourth, seventh, and 10th), an even number of classrooms will be selected from each school-half will be assigned to the intervention arm and half will be assigned to the control arm. The intervention will consist of 3 moderated psychodramatic performances by trained actors, and the control condition will be the usual school day. Outcome data will be collected at baseline (preintervention), 2-week postintervention (short term), and 6-month postintervention (medium term). Outcomes will include social-emotional competency; self-reported bullying and experiences of being bullied; receptivity to the program; and school-level data on truancy, absenteeism, and referrals to school displinary action for bullying. A power analysis adjusted for clustering effect, design effect, and potential attrition yielded a need for approximately 1594 students, consisting of an estimated 80 classrooms split evenly into intervention and control arms.

resultsThis study was funded in June 2019; approved by the Indiana University Institutional review board on September 17, 2019; began subject recruitment on November 5, 2019; and prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.

conclusionsMany states have issued recommendations for the integration of SEL into schools. The proposed study uses a rigorous methodology to determine if the ACT OUT! psychodramatic intervention is a cost-effective means of bolstering SEC and reducing bullying incidence in schools.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04097496; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04097496. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/17900.

Indexed as

bullyingpsychodramarandomized controlled trialsocial and emotional learningsocial-emotional competence

Identifiers

PMID32281541
PMCPMC7186869
OpenAlexW3015361879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.