ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2020
Body stalk anomalies in pig-Definition and classification.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Presentation and Diagnostic Challenges of Congenital Thoracoabdominal Wall Defects in Dogs: Insights from a Case Series and Literature Synthesis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Cantrell Syndrome and the One Health Perspective: A Unified Review of Human and Comparative Cases.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Complex Body Wall Closure Defects in Seven Dog Fetuses: An Anatomic and CT Scan Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Body stalk anomalies and their relationship to amniotic band disruption complex in six cats.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Body Stalk Anomalies in Pigs: Current Trends and Future Directions in Classification.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- First trimester diagnosis of body stalk anomaly complicated by ectopia cordis.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Anatomy-based diagnostic criteria for complex body wall anomalies (CBWA).Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Article
- Body stalk anomalies in pig-Definition and classification.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of body wall closing defects (abdominoschisis and thoracoabdominoschisis) in combination with other congenital malformations was studied in the pig (Sus scrofa domesticus). After clinical examination and literature review, body wall defects with multiple congenital anomalies in eight pigs were described, and classified using anatomical and embryological criteria. Several BSA presentations were identified and classified as follows: (a) BSA Type I: fetus with spinal and UC defects, thoracoabdominoschisis, anal atresia and/or other internal organs structural defects, and structural limb defects; (b) BSA Type II: fetus with spinal and UC defects, thoracoabdominoschisis, anal atresia and/or other internal organs structural defects, and nonstructural limb defects; (c) BSA Type III: fetus with spinal and UC defects, abdominoschisis, anal atresia and/or other internal organs structural defects, and structural limb defects; and (d) BSA Type IV: fetus with spinal and UC defects, abdominoschisis, anal atresia and/or other internal organs structural defects, and nonstructural limb defects. Two types of LBWC were differentiated: LBWC Type I: characterized by thoracoabdominoschisis and structural limb defects, and LBWC Type II: characterized by abdominoschisis and structural limb defects, corresponding to BSA type I and type III. This is the first report on BSA and LBWC in the pig.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.