Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32281289›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2020

Two cancer stem cell-targeted therapies in clinical trials as viewed from the standpoint of the cancer stem cell model.

Ingrid W Caras

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Cancer Stem Cells: Future Possibilities for Cancer Therapy.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2023
    Article
  8. Targeting cancer stem cell plasticity in triple-negative breast cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Patient-Derived Tumor Chemosensitization of GKB202, anMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ingrid W CarasCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Oakland, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8902-808X
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key implication of the cancer stem cell model is that for a cancer therapy to be curative, it is imperative to eliminate the cancer stem cells (CSCs) that drive tumor progression. The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine is supporting two novel approaches that target CSCs, one an antibody-mediated immunotherapy targeting CD47 and the other an antibody targeting ROR1. This article summarizes the evidence that CSCs are targeted and discusses the results of early clinical trials within the context of the CSC model.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem Cellscancer stem cellsclinical trialsdrug targetimmunotherapyleukemia

Identifiers

PMID32281289
PMCPMC7381803
OpenAlexW3015730868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.