Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32281254›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2020

A method of using deep learning to predict three-dimensional dose distributions for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of rectal cancer.

Jieping Zhou, Zhao Peng, Yuchen Song, Yankui Chang, Xi Pei, Liusi Sheng, X George Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jieping ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Zhao PengDepartment of Engineering and Applied Physics, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yuchen SongDepartment of Engineering and Applied Physics, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yankui ChangDepartment of Engineering and Applied Physics, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xi PeiDepartment of Engineering and Applied Physics, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Liusi ShengNational Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
X George XuDepartment of Engineering and Applied Physics, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
University of Science and Technology of China · CNNational Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory · CN

Funding

Anhui Key Research and Development Plan 1804a09020039National Key Research and Development Program 2017YFC0107500National Natural Science Foundation of China 11575180,Youth Fund of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China West District 2018YJQN014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and test a three-dimensional (3D) deep learning model for predicting 3D voxel-wise dose distributions for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

methodsA total of 122 postoperative rectal cancer cases treated by IMRT were considered in the study, of which 100 cases were randomly selected as the training-validating set and the remaining as the testing set. A 3D deep learning model named 3D U-Res-Net_B was constructed to predict 3D dose distributions. Eight types of 3D matrices from CT images, contoured structures, and beam configurations were fed into the independent input channel, respectively, and the 3D matrix of dose distributions was taken as the output to train the 3D model. The obtained 3D model was used to predict new 3D dose distributions. The predicted accuracy was evaluated in two aspects: (a) The dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of different isodose volumes, the average dose difference of all voxels within the body, and 3%/5 mm global gamma passing rates of organs at risks (OARs) and planned target volume (PTV) were used to address the spatial correspondence between predicted and clinical delivered 3D dose distributions; (b) The dosimetric index (DI) including homogeneity index, conformity index, V

resultsThe 3D U-Res-Net_B model predicted 3D dose distributions accurately. For the 22 testing cases, the average prediction bias ranged from -1.94% to 1.58%, and the overall mean absolute errors (MAEs) was 3.92 ± 4.16%; there was no statistically significant difference for nearly all DIs. The model had a DSCs value above 0.9 for most isodose volumes, and global 3D gamma passing rates varying from 0.81 to 0.90 for PTV and OARs, clearly outperforming 3D U-Res-Net_O and being slightly superior to 3D U-Net.

conclusionsThis study developed a more general deep learning model by considering beam configurations input and achieved an accurate 3D voxel-wise dose prediction for rectal cancer treated by IMRT, a potentially easier clinical implementation for more comprehensive automatic planning.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRectal NeoplasmsHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted3D deep learning architecturedose predictionIMRTrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID32281254
PMCPMC7286006
OpenAlexW3016181364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.