Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32281231›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2020

Containing COVID-19 in the Emergency Department: The Role of Improved Case Detection and Segregation of Suspect Cases.

Liang E Wee, Tzay-Ping Fua, Ying Y Chua, Andrew F W Ho, Xiang Y J Sim, Edwin P Conceicao, Indumathi Venkatachalam, Kenneth B-K Tan, Ban H Tan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. COVID-19 Incidence After Emergency Department Visit.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liang E WeeFrom the, Singhealth Infectious Diseases Residency, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6428-9999
Tzay-Ping Fuathe, Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Ying Y Chuathe, Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Andrew F W Hothe, Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Xiang Y J Simthe, Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Edwin P Conceicaoand the, Department of Infection Prevention and Epidemiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Indumathi Venkatachalamthe, Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Kenneth B-K Tanthe, Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Ban H Tanthe, Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Singapore General Hospital · SGSingHealth · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatients with COVID-19 may present with respiratory syndromes indistinguishable from common viruses. This poses a challenge for early detection during triage in the emergency department (ED). Over a 3-month period, our ED aimed to minimize nosocomial transmission by using broader suspect case criteria for better detection and using appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for health care workers (HCWs).

methodsAll ED admissions with respiratory syndromes over a 3-month period were tested for COVID-19. The sensitivity and specificity of screening criteria in detecting COVID-19 were assessed. A risk-stratified approach was adopted for PPE usage in the ED, based on high-risk "fever areas" and lower-risk zones. When a case of COVID-19 was confirmed, surveillance was conducted for potentially exposed patients and HCWs.

resultsA total of 1,841 cases presenting with respiratory syndromes required admission over the study period. Among these, 70 cases of COVID-19 were subsequently confirmed. The majority (84.2%, 59/70) were detected at ED triage because they fulfilled suspect case criteria. Of these, 34 met the official screening criteria; an additional 25 were detected by the broader internal screening criteria. Over the 12-week period, the cumulative sensitivity of internal screening criteria was 84.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 73.6% to 91.9%), whereas the sensitivity of the official screening criteria was 48.6% (95% CI = 36.4% to 60.8%). Given the broadened internal criteria, the preexisting ED "fever area" was insufficient and had to be expanded. However, there were no cases of nosocomial transmission from intra-ED exposure, despite extensive surveillance.

conclusionFrontline physicians need to be given leeway to decide on the disposition of cases based on clinical suspicion during an ongoing outbreak of COVID-19. If a broader criterion is used at ED triage, ED facilities and isolation facilities need to be readied to accommodate a surge of suspect cases. Usage of appropriate PPE is essential in minimizing nosocomial transmission.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPatient IsolationBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksFemaleFeverHealth PersonnelHospitalizationHumansMaleMass ScreeningPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentPneumonia, Viral

Identifiers

PMID32281231
PMCPMC7262126
OpenAlexW3016176330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.