Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32281166›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020

The potential of circulating microRNA-125a and microRNA-125b as markers for inflammation and clinical response to infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Peng Cheng, Jun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Towards Personalized Medicine in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Role of Liquid Biopsies in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peng ChengDepartment of Pharmacy, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Jun WangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7236-5760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was to investigate the changes in circulating microRNA (miR)-125a and miR-125b during infliximab (IFX) treatment, and their value in predicting clinical response to IFX in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

methodsThe plasma samples were obtained from 96 active RA patients who underwent 24-week IFX treatment and from 96 healthy controls to detect miR-125a and miR-125b expressions by RT-qPCR. Clinical response was assessed according to EULAR criteria based on disease activity alleviation at week 4, week 12, and week 24.

resultsMiR-125a and miR-125b expressions were both elevated in RA patients compared with healthy controls, and they could differentiate RA patients from healthy controls by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Baseline miR-125a positively correlated with C-reactive protein (CRP) level; meanwhile, baseline miR-125b positively correlated with tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), CRP, and DAS28-ESR score in RA patients. With the 24-week IFX treatment, clinical response rate was gradually increased, while miR-125a and miR-125b expressions were gradually decreased in RA patients. At week 24, 69 (71.9%) patients responded to IFX treatment, while 27 (28.1%) patients did not respond to IFX treatment. Importantly, baseline miR-125a and miR-125b expressions were higher in responders than that in non-responders, further multivariate logistic regression analysis disclosed that miR-125b but not miR-125a could independently predict better clinical response to IFX in RA patients.

conclusionCirculating miR-125a and miR-125b displays the potency for guiding personalized treatment strategy and improving clinical outcomes in RA patients.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidAgedAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersBlood SedimentationCirculating MicroRNADrug MonitoringFemaleHumansInflammationInfliximabMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersCirculating MicroRNAInfliximabMicroRNAsMIRN125 microRNA, humanclinical responseinfliximabmicroRNA-125amicroRNA-125brheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID32281166
PMCPMC7439431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.