Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32281145›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2020

Solar ultraviolet-induced DNA damage response: Melanocytes story in transformation to environmental melanomagenesis.

Soumyadeep Sarkar, Shobhan Gaddameedhi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The cutaneous microbiome as a dynamic photoprotective interface against solar radiation.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Effects of Physical Activity on Skin Health: A Narrative Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Focus on the Contribution of Oxidative Stress in Skin Aging.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Zn(ferulate)-LSH Systems as Multifunctional Filters.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soumyadeep SarkarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington, USA.
Shobhan GaddameedhiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington, USA.
Washington State University Spokane · US

Funding

DNA Repair Mechanisms and Circadian Clock Disruption in the CorneaR01ES030113 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GADDAMEEDHI, SHOBHAN · 2020 to 2025
$2.1M
Role of the circadian clock in melanocyte biology and UV-induced melanomagenesisR00ES022640 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GADDAMEEDHI, SHOBHAN · 2015 to 2017
$747k
Chronotherapy as a Strategy to Attenuate Toxicity Associated with Cisplatin and Radiation Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast CancerR21CA227381 · NCI · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GADDAMEEDHI, SHOBHAN · 2018 to 2019
$361k
Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs CA171123NCI NIH HHS L30 CA171123NCI NIH HHS R21 CA227381NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES022640NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to sunlight is both beneficial, as it heats the planet to a comfortable temperature, and potentially harmful, since sunlight contains ultraviolet radiation (UVR), which is deemed detrimental for living organisms. Earth's ozone layer plays a vital role in blocking most of the extremely dangerous UVC; however, low frequency/energy UVR (i.e., UVB and UVA) seeps through in minute amount and reaches the Earth's surface. Both UVB and UVA are physiologically responsible for a plethora of skin ailments, including skin cancers. The UVR is readily absorbed by the genomic DNA of skin cells, causing DNA bond distortion and UV-induced DNA damage. As a defense mechanism, the DNA damage response (DDR) signaling in skin cells activates nucleotide excision repair (NER), which is responsible for the removal of UVR-induced DNA photolesions and helps maintain the genomic integrity of the cells. Failure of proper NER function leads to mutagenesis and development of skin cancers. One of the deadliest form of skin cancers is melanoma which originates upon the genetic transformation of melanocytes, melanin producing skin cells. NER is a well-studied DNA repair system in the whole skin, as a tissue, but not much is known about it in melanocytes. Therefore, this review encapsulates NER in melanocytes, with a specific focus on its functional regulators and their cross talks due to skin heterogeneity and divulging the potential knowledge gap in the field.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansMelanocytesMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsSunlightUltraviolet Rayscircadian clockDDR signalingET-1melanocytesNERsolar UVBαMSH

Identifiers

PMID32281145
PMCPMC9675355
OpenAlexW3016114137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.