SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2020
Efficacy and safety of low dose rivaroxaban in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does aspirin reduce the incidence, recurrence, and mortality of colorectal cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- Benefit and risk of adding rivaroxaban in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2021Pooled it
- Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs. Aspirin in Addition to Clopidogrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Coronary Atherosclerotic Heart Disease Patients with Gastrointestinal Disease.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Trial
- Rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery ectasia: 36-month outcomes and risk prediction from a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Dual-pathway Inhibition with Low-dose Aspirin and Rivaroxaban versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Peripheral Artery Disease: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.European cardiology · 2024Review
- Multi-centric study for development and validation of a CT head rule for mild traumatic brain injury in direct oral anticoagulants: the HERO-M nomogram.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Low dose rivaroxaban for the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Review
- Effects of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban on the differentiation of endothelial progenitor cells.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Low Dose Rivaroxaban for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The mortality effects and risk-benefit profile of low dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) in patients with coronary heart disease are not completely understood. Five randomized controlled trials (26,110 patients) were selected using PubMed and Cochrane library till April 2019. The background antiplatelet therapy was aspirin in 3 trials, P2Y12 inhibitor in 1 trial, and in 1 trial 65% patients received aspirin and 35% were on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The outcomes of interest were cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and major bleeding events. Random effects hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Low dose rivaroxaban did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.73-1.11, P = 0.34) or all-cause mortality (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.74-1.12, P = 0.38) compared with control. However, low dose rivaroxaban was associated with reduction in MI (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.99, P = 0.04), and stroke (HR 0.59, 95%CI 0.48-0.73, P < 0.001) at the expense of major bleeding (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.39-1.94, P < 0.001) compared with control. These effects did not vary according to acute coronary syndrome or stable coronary heart disease (P-interaction > 0.05). The use of low dose rivaroxaban in patients with coronary heart disease predominantly receiving antiplatelet monotherapy did not reduce cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. The benefits of preventing MI and stroke were balanced by increased risk of major bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.