Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32281028›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2020

Evaluating severity of white matter lesions from computed tomography images with convolutional neural network.

Johanna Pitkänen, Juha Koikkalainen, Tuomas Nieminen, Ivan Marinkovic, Sami Curtze, Gerli Sibolt, Hanna Jokinen, Daniel Rueckert, Frederik Barkhof, Reinhold Schmidt and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Johanna PitkänenDepartment of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 302, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. johanna.pitkanen@hus.fi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-7692
Juha KoikkalainenCombinostics Ltd., Tampere, Finland and VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tampere, Finland.
Tuomas NieminenCombinostics Ltd., Tampere, Finland and VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tampere, Finland.
Ivan MarinkovicDepartment of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 302, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Sami CurtzeDepartment of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 302, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Gerli SiboltDepartment of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 302, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Hanna JokinenDepartment of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 302, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Daniel RueckertBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Frederik BarkhofDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reinhold SchmidtDepartment of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Leonardo PantoniL. Sacco Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Philip ScheltensAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lars-Olof WahlundDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Antti KorvenojaHUS Medical Imaging Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jyrki LötjönenCombinostics Ltd., Tampere, Finland and VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tampere, Finland.
Timo ErkinjunttiDepartment of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 302, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Susanna MelkasDepartment of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 302, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri Y1249NEUR2State funding for university-level health research TYH2016207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeverity of white matter lesion (WML) is typically evaluated on magnetic resonance images (MRI), yet the more accessible, faster, and less expensive method is computed tomography (CT). Our objective was to study whether WML can be automatically segmented from CT images using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The second aim was to compare CT segmentation with MRI segmentation.

methodsThe brain images from the Helsinki University Hospital clinical image archive were systematically screened to make CT-MRI image pairs. Selection criteria for the study were that both CT and MRI images were acquired within 6 weeks. In total, 147 image pairs were included. We used CNN to segment WML from CT images. Training and testing of CNN for CT was performed using 10-fold cross-validation, and the segmentation results were compared with the corresponding segmentations from MRI.

resultsA Pearson correlation of 0.94 was obtained between the automatic WML volumes of MRI and CT segmentations. The average Dice similarity index validating the overlap between CT and FLAIR segmentations was 0.68 for the Fazekas 3 group.

conclusionCNN-based segmentation of CT images may provide a means to evaluate the severity of WML and establish a link between CT WML patterns and the current standard MRI-based visual rating scale.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalLeukoaraiosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSeverity of Illness IndexSoftwareCerebral small vessel diseaseComputed tomographyConvolutional neural networkMachine learningWhite matter lesions

Identifiers

PMID32281028
PMCPMC7478948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.