ArticleNeuroradiology2020
Evaluating severity of white matter lesions from computed tomography images with convolutional neural network.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep optimization-guided hybrid neural network for accurate detection and segmentation of white matter hyperintensities in clinical MRI images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advantage of grading classification using volumetric artificial intelligence for periventricular hyperintensity and deep subcortical white matter hyperintensity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Segmentation of Leukoaraiosis on Noncontrast Head CT Using CT-MRI Paired Data Without Human Annotation.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Relationship between elevated homocysteine levels and the degree of white matter lesions in stroke patients.Medicine · 2025Observational
- Deep learning-based white matter lesion volume on CT is associated with outcome after acute ischemic stroke.European radiology · 2024Article
- Developmental Auditory and Speech-Language Performance in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation Recipients with Stable White Matter Lesions.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Fully Automatic Classification of Brain Atrophy on NCCT Images in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Pilot Study Using Deep Learning Models.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- A novel CT-based automated analysis method provides comparable results with MRI in measuring brain atrophy and white matter lesions.Neuroradiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSeverity of white matter lesion (WML) is typically evaluated on magnetic resonance images (MRI), yet the more accessible, faster, and less expensive method is computed tomography (CT). Our objective was to study whether WML can be automatically segmented from CT images using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The second aim was to compare CT segmentation with MRI segmentation.
methodsThe brain images from the Helsinki University Hospital clinical image archive were systematically screened to make CT-MRI image pairs. Selection criteria for the study were that both CT and MRI images were acquired within 6 weeks. In total, 147 image pairs were included. We used CNN to segment WML from CT images. Training and testing of CNN for CT was performed using 10-fold cross-validation, and the segmentation results were compared with the corresponding segmentations from MRI.
resultsA Pearson correlation of 0.94 was obtained between the automatic WML volumes of MRI and CT segmentations. The average Dice similarity index validating the overlap between CT and FLAIR segmentations was 0.68 for the Fazekas 3 group.
conclusionCNN-based segmentation of CT images may provide a means to evaluate the severity of WML and establish a link between CT WML patterns and the current standard MRI-based visual rating scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.