Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32281020›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2020

Feasibility and usability of real-time intraoperative quantitative fluorescent-guided perfusion assessment during resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Nikolaj Nerup, Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen, Lars Bo Svendsen, Michael Patrick Achiam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nikolaj NerupDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK- 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. nikolajnerup@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4066-2925
Morten Bo Søndergaard SvendsenCopenhagen Academy of Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Bo SvendsenDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK- 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael Patrick AchiamDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK- 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnastomotic leakage after resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer is a dangerous complication, and leakage rates have remained stable for decades. Perfusion is crucial for anastomotic healing, but traditional perfusion assessment is limited in a minimally invasive environment. New methods as indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) have proven promising, but quantitative analysis has been challenging. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and usability of real-time intraoperative quantitative fluorescence angiography (q-ICG) with a touchscreen tablet.

methodsA software for q-ICG was previously developed and validated. Ten patients underwent perfusion assessment in white light (WL), with ICG-FA, and with q-ICG during Ivor-Lewis esophageal resection. The usability of the tablet-based software was tested with the System Usability Scale (SUS®). Furthermore, we investigated the differences in perfusion assessment as the distance from the conduit margin to a surgeon selected point of sufficient perfusion for anastomosis using the different modalities.

resultsQ-ICG was successful in all patients, with an excellent median SUS® of 82.5 (77.5-93.8). Significant differences in distances from the conduit margin to points of sufficient perfusion selected by the surgeons were found: ICG: WL = 14.1 mm (p = 0.048), q-ICG: WL = 32.08 mm (p < 0.001), and q-ICG: ICG = 17.95 mm (p = 0.002). Furthermore, significant differences of perfusion were found between the points, when q-ICG was performed retrospectively in the surgeon selected areas (p = 0.008-0.013).

conclusionReal-time intraoperative touchscreen-based q-ICG was feasible with excellent usability, and differences in sufficient perfusion points selected by the surgeons between modalities were found. Further studies should focus on clinical relevance and determine cutoff values associated with anastomotic leakage.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyEsophagogastric JunctionSurgery, Computer-AssistedAdenocarcinomaAgedCohort StudiesColoring AgentsDenmarkEsophageal NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleFluorescein AngiographyHumansIndocyanine GreenMaleMiddle AgedColoring AgentsIndocyanine GreenAnastomotic leakEsophageal neoplasmsImage guided surgeryIndocyanine greenPerfusion imaging

Identifiers

PMID32281020
OpenAlexW3015306898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.