Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32280978›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2020

An objective and reliable electrophysiological marker for implicit trustworthiness perception.

Derek C Swe, Romina Palermo, O Scott Gwinn, Gillian Rhodes, Markus Neumann, Shanèle Payart, Clare A M Sutherland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Covert neural and autonomic signatures of shared perception.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Face evaluation: Findings, methods, and challenges.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding trait impressions from faces.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Derek C SweSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Romina PalermoSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
O Scott GwinnCollege of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.
Gillian RhodesSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Markus NeumannSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Shanèle PayartSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Clare A M SutherlandSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trustworthiness is assumed to be processed implicitly from faces, despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of research has only involved explicit trustworthiness judgements. To answer the question whether or not trustworthiness processing can be implicit, we apply an electroencephalography fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) paradigm, where electrophysiological cortical activity is triggered in synchrony with facial trustworthiness cues, without explicit judgements. Face images were presented at 6 Hz, with facial trustworthiness varying at 1 Hz. Significant responses at 1 Hz were observed, indicating that differences in the trustworthiness of the faces were reflected in the neural signature. These responses were significantly reduced for inverted faces, suggesting that the results are associated with higher order face processing. The neural responses were reliable, and correlated with explicit trustworthiness judgements, suggesting that the technique is capable of picking up on stable individual differences in trustworthiness processing. By demonstrating neural activity associated with implicit trustworthiness judgements, our results contribute to resolving a key theoretical debate. Moreover, our data show that FPVS is a valuable tool to examine face processing at the individual level, with potential application in pre-verbal and clinical populations who struggle with verbalization, understanding or memory.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingCuesElectroencephalographyElectrophysiological PhenomenaFacial RecognitionFemaleGoalsHumansIndividualityJudgmentMaleMemoryPhotic StimulationEEGfast periodic visual stimulationimplicit perceptionSSVEPtrustworthiness impressions

Identifiers

PMID32280978
PMCPMC7235960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.