ArticleACS omega2020
Support Vector Regression-Based Monte Carlo Simulation of Flexible Water Clusters.
Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular simulations based on classical force fields are computationally efficient but lack accuracy due to the empirical formulation of non-bonded interactions. Quantum mechanical (QM) methods, albeit accurate, have inhibitory computational costs for large molecules and clusters. Hence, to overcome the bottleneck, machine learning (ML)-based methods have been employed in the recent years. We had earlier reported a combined scheme of many-body expansion (MBE) and ML to predict the interaction energies of rigid water clusters. In this work, we proceed toward building a flexible water model using the ML-MBE scheme. This ML-MBE scheme has an error of <1% for interaction energy prediction in comparison to the parent QM method for flexible water decamers. Machine learning-based Monte Carlo simulations (MLMC) are performed with this water model, and the structural properties of these configurations are compared with those obtained from ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) and the TIP3P classical force field. The radial distribution functions, tetrahedral order parameters, and number of hydrogen bonds in AIMD and MLMC have a similar qualitative and quantitative trend, whereas the classical force fields show a significant deviation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.