Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32280847›Full record

ArticleACS omega2020

Support Vector Regression-Based Monte Carlo Simulation of Flexible Water Clusters.

Samik Bose, Suman Chakrabarty, Debashree Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samik BoseSchool of Chemical Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata 700032, West Bengal, India.
Suman ChakrabartyDepartment of Chemical, Biological & Macromolecular Sciences, S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, Kolkata 700106, West Bengal, India.
Debashree GhoshSchool of Chemical Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata 700032, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular simulations based on classical force fields are computationally efficient but lack accuracy due to the empirical formulation of non-bonded interactions. Quantum mechanical (QM) methods, albeit accurate, have inhibitory computational costs for large molecules and clusters. Hence, to overcome the bottleneck, machine learning (ML)-based methods have been employed in the recent years. We had earlier reported a combined scheme of many-body expansion (MBE) and ML to predict the interaction energies of rigid water clusters. In this work, we proceed toward building a flexible water model using the ML-MBE scheme. This ML-MBE scheme has an error of <1% for interaction energy prediction in comparison to the parent QM method for flexible water decamers. Machine learning-based Monte Carlo simulations (MLMC) are performed with this water model, and the structural properties of these configurations are compared with those obtained from ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) and the TIP3P classical force field. The radial distribution functions, tetrahedral order parameters, and number of hydrogen bonds in AIMD and MLMC have a similar qualitative and quantitative trend, whereas the classical force fields show a significant deviation.

Identifiers

PMID32280847
PMCPMC7143414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.