Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32280585›Full record

ArticlePhotoacoustics2020

Soft ultrasound priors in optoacoustic reconstruction: Improving clinical vascular imaging.

Hong Yang, Dominik Jüstel, Jaya Prakash, Angelos Karlas, Anne Helfen, Max Masthoff, Moritz Wildgruber, Vasilis Ntziachristos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photoacoustics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances in Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Photoacoustic imaging for microcirculation.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Model-Based X-Ray-Induced Acoustic Computed Tomography.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Optoacoustic imaging in endocrinology and metabolism.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hong YangInstitute of Biological and Medical Imaging (IBMI), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, D-85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Dominik JüstelInstitute of Biological and Medical Imaging (IBMI), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, D-85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Jaya PrakashDept. of Instrumentation and Applied Physics, Indian Institute of Science, C. V. Raman Road, 560012, Bangalore, India.
Angelos KarlasInstitute of Biological and Medical Imaging (IBMI), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, D-85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Anne HelfenDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, A16, 49149, Muenster, Germany.
Max MasthoffDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, A16, 49149, Muenster, Germany.
Moritz WildgruberDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, A16, 49149, Muenster, Germany.
Vasilis NtziachristosInstitute of Biological and Medical Imaging (IBMI), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, D-85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEIndian Institute of Science Bangalore · INLMU Klinikum · DETUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using the same ultrasound detector, hybrid optoacoustic-ultrasound (OPUS) imaging provides concurrent scans of tissue slices or volumes and visualizes complementary sound- and light-based contrast at similar resolutions. In addition to the benefit of hybrid contrast, spatial co-registration enables images from one modality to be employed as prior information for improving an aspect of the performance of the other modality. We consider herein a handheld OPUS system and utilize structural information from ultrasound images to guide regional Laplacian regularization-based reconstruction of optoacoustic images. Using phantoms and data from OPUS scans of human radial and carotid arteries, we show that ultrasound-driven optoacoustic inversion reduces limited-view artefacts and improves image contrast. In phantoms, prior-integrated reconstruction leads to a 50 % higher contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the image than standard reconstruction, and a 17 % higher structural similarity (SSIM) index. In clinical data, prior-integrated reconstruction detects deep-seated radial arteries with higher CNR than the standard method at three different depths. In this way, the prior-integrated method offers unique insights into atherosclerotic carotid plaques in humans (with p<0.01 between patients and healthy volunteers), potentially paving the way for new abilities in vascular imaging and more generally in optoacoustic imaging.

Indexed as

CarotidHybrid imagingPhotoacousticsRadial arteryRegional Laplacian regularization

Identifiers

PMID32280585
PMCPMC7139114
OpenAlexW3012127165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.