ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020
Selection or drift: The population biology underlying transposon insertion sequencing experiments.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Profiling of genetic determinants required for fitness of community-associated methicillin-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- ConNIS and labeling instability: New statistical methods for improving the detection of essential genes in TraDIS libraries.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Whole genome-scale assessment of gene fitness of Novosphingobium aromaticavorans during spaceflight.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Evolution, persistence, and host adaption of a gonococcal AMR plasmid that emerged in the pre-antibiotic era.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Review
- Refined Quantification of Infection Bottlenecks and Pathogen Dissemination with STAMPR.mSystems · 2021Article
- Quantification ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- RESTAMP - Rate estimates by sequence-tag analysis of microbial populations.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transposon insertion sequencing methods such as Tn-seq revolutionized microbiology by allowing the identification of genomic loci that are critical for viability in a specific environment on a genome-wide scale. While powerful, transposon insertion sequencing suffers from limited reproducibility when different analysis methods are compared. From the perspective of population biology, this may be explained by changes in mutant frequency due to chance (drift) rather than differential fitness (selection). Here, we develop a mathematical model of the population biology of transposon insertion sequencing experiments, i.e. the changes in size and composition of the transposon-mutagenized population during the experiment. We use this model to investigate mutagenesis, the growth of the mutant library, and its passage through bottlenecks. Specifically, we study how these processes can lead to extinction of individual mutants depending on their fitness and the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of the entire mutant population. We find that in typical in vitro experiments few mutants with high fitness go extinct. However, bottlenecks of a size that is common in animal infection models lead to so much random extinction that a large number of viable mutants would be misclassified. While mutants with low fitness are more likely to be lost during the experiment, mutants with intermediate fitness are expected to be much more abundant and can constitute a large proportion of detected hits, i.e. false positives. Thus, incorporating the DFEs of randomly generated mutations in the analysis may improve the reproducibility of transposon insertion experiments, especially when strong bottlenecks are encountered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.