Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32280357›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2020

The Prognostic Value of Autophagy-Related Markers Bclin-1 and LC-3 in Colorectal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jin-Xiao Li, Qian Yan, Na Liu, Wen-Jiang Zheng, Man Hu, Zhao-Min Yu, Yu-Dian Zhou, Xiong-Wen Wang, Feng-Xia Liang, Rui Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. ATP and cancer immunosurveillance.The EMBO journal · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jin-Xiao LiDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022 Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-2279
Qian YanGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 510405 Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2892-7145
Na LiuDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Chengdu University of Chinese Medicine, 610075 Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2523-7904
Wen-Jiang ZhengGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 510405 Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5234-0339
Man HuDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022 Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6801-1318
Zhao-Min YuDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022 Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9866-2541
Yu-Dian ZhouDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, 430065 Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2162-2381
Xiong-Wen WangFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 510405 Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5428-7110
Feng-Xia LiangDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, 430065 Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0272-7735
Rui ChenDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022 Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1587-0362
Union Hospital · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNHubei University of Chinese Medicine · CNChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAt present, the relationship between autophagosomes and the prognosis of various cancers has become a subject of active investigation. A series of studies have demonstrated the correlation between autophagy microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC-3), Beclin-1, and colorectal cancer (CRC). Since autophagy has dual regulatory roles in tumors, the results of this correlation are also uncertain. Hence, we summarized the relationship between Beclin-1, LC-3, and CRC using systematic reviews and meta-analysis to clarify their prognostic significance in it.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched online up to April 1, 2019. The quality of the involving studies was assessed against the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) in a fixed or random effects model were used to assess the strength of correlation between Beclin-1, LC-3, and CRC.

resultsA total of 9 articles were collected, involving 2,297 patients. Most literatures scored more than 6 points, suggesting that the quality of our including research was acceptable. Our finding suggested that the expression of Beclin-1 was not associated with overall survival (HR = 0.68, 95% CI (0.31-1.52),

conclusionsAutophagy-related proteins of LC-3 might be an important marker of CRC progression. However, since the number of the original studies was limited, more well-designed, large-scale, high-quality studies are warranted to provide more convincing and reliable information.

Identifiers

PMID32280357
PMCPMC7125475
OpenAlexW3012718994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.