Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32280341›Full record

ReviewAnesthesiology research and practice2020

The Effect of Intraoperative Methadone Compared to Morphine on Postsurgical Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Mark C Kendall, Lucas J Alves, Kristi Pence, Taif Mukhdomi, Daniel Croxford, Gildasio S De Oliveira

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark C KendallDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5641-8674
Lucas J AlvesDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Kristi PenceDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Taif MukhdomiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Daniel CroxfordDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Gildasio S De OliveiraDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Brown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodsWe performed a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar electronic databases. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model, weighted mean differences (WMD), standard deviation, 95% confidence intervals, and sample size. Methodological quality was evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration's tool.

resultsSeven randomized controlled trials evaluating 337 patients across different surgical procedures were included. The aggregated effect of intraoperative methadone on postoperative opioid consumption did not reveal a significant effect, WMD (95% CI) of -0.51 (-1.79 to 0.76), (

conclusionsThe use of intraoperative methadone reduces postoperative pain when compared to morphine. In addition, the beneficial effect of methadone on postoperative pain is not attributable to an increase in postsurgical opioid consumption. Our results suggest that intraoperative methadone may be a viable strategy to reduce acute pain in surgical patients.

Identifiers

PMID32280341
PMCPMC7140144
OpenAlexW3013558567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.