Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32280327›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2020

Klaus Wakonig, Hans-Christian Stadler, Michal Odstrčil, Esther H R Tsai, Ana Diaz, Mirko Holler, Ivan Usov, Jörg Raabe, Andreas Menzel, Manuel Guizar-Sicairos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Altermagnetic polar metallic phase in ultrathin epitaxially strained RuOProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. In Situ Ptychographic X-ray Computed Tomography of Fully Hydrated Polyamide Membranes.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Klaus WakonigPaul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Hans-Christian StadlerPaul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Michal OdstrčilPaul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Esther H R TsaiPaul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Ana DiazPaul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Mirko HollerPaul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Ivan UsovPaul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Jörg RaabePaul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Andreas MenzelPaul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Manuel Guizar-SicairosPaul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8293-3634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, ptychography has been proven to be a robust tool for non-destructive high-resolution quantitative electron, X-ray and optical microscopy. It allows for quantitative reconstruction of the specimen's transmissivity, as well as recovery of the illuminating wavefront. Additionally, various algorithms have been developed to account for systematic errors and improved convergence. With fast ptychographic microscopes and more advanced algorithms, both the complexity of the reconstruction task and the data volume increase significantly.

Indexed as

high-performance computingMATLABphase retrievalptychographyPtychoShelvessynchrotrons

Identifiers

PMID32280327
PMCPMC7133065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.