Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32280218›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2020

Nanoformulated Bioactive Compounds Derived from Different Natural Products Combat Pancreatic Cancer Cell Proliferation.

Deena S Mousa, Ali H El-Far, Amna A Saddiq, Thangirala Sudha, Shaker A Mousa

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Role of Phytoconstituents in Cancer Treatment: A Review.Recent advances in food, nutrition & agriculture · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Ferroptosis: A New Road towards Cancer Management.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Deena S MousaYale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ali H El-FarDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-9721-4360
Amna A SaddiqFaculty of Science, Department of Biology, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Thangirala SudhaPharmaceutical Research Institute, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA.
Shaker A MousaPharmaceutical Research Institute, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9294-015X
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USDamanhour University · EGUniversity of Jeddah · SAYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was designed to determine the potential effect of nanoencapsulated bioactive compounds from different natural sources on human pancreatic cancer.

backgroundPancreatic cancer carries the highest fatality rate among all human cancers because of its high metastatic potential and late presentation at the time of diagnosis. Hence there is a need for improved methods to prevent and treat it. Natural products, such as 3, 3'-diindolylmethane (DIM) and ellagic acid (EA) demonstrated anticancer efficacy against various cancer types. However, DIM is insoluble. Hence, using nanotechnology to encapsulate these compounds in combination with EA might improve their physical and chemical properties and their delivery to the cancer cells.

methodsHuman pancreatic cancer cells, namely SUIT2-luciferase transfected, were used to examine the effects of DIM or EA and their nanoformulation in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) [PLGA-PEG] nanoparticles (NPs) on SUIT2-luciferase cell viability/proliferation over 24 hrs. Additionally, effects on tumor weight and angiogenesis were determined using the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) tumor implant model.

resultsBoth DIM and EA PLGA-PEG NPs resulted in rapid suppression of pancreatic cancer cell viability/proliferation within 24 hrs (

conclusionNanoformulation of DIM and EA resulted in a more effective suppression of pancreatic cancer cell viability, pancreatic tumor weight, implanted cancer cell viability, and tumor angiogenesis as compared with these bioactive compounds alone.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiological ProductsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalChick EmbryoChorioallantoic MembraneEllagic AcidHumansIndolesNanoparticlesPancreatic NeoplasmsPolyestersPolyethylene Glycols3,3'-diindolylmethaneAntineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsEllagic AcidIndolesPolyesterspolyethylene glycol-poly(lactide-co-glycolide)Polyethylene Glycolspoly(lactide)3, 3′-diindolylmethaneanti-angiogenesischick chorioallantoic membrane modelellagic acidpancreatic cancerPLGA-PEG nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID32280218
PMCPMC7127850
OpenAlexW3012997341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.