Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32280206›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2020

Agreement of a Short Form of the Self-Administered Multidimensional Prognostic Index (SELFY-MPI-SF): A Useful Tool for the Self-Assessment of Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older People.

Alberto Cella, Alberto Ferrari, Giuseppe Rengo, Vincenzo Solfrizzi, Nicola Veronese, Matteo Puntoni, Sabrina Zora, Alberto Pilotto, Filippo Fimognari, SELFY-MPI SIGOT Investigators

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto CellaGeriatric Unit, Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, EO Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy.
Alberto FerrariGeriatric Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, AUSL Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2028-9545
Giuseppe RengoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Division of Geriatrics, Federico II University, Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9701-0437
Vincenzo SolfrizziDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Nicola VeronesePrimary Care Department, Azienda ULSS 3 Serenissima, Venice, Italy.
Matteo PuntoniScientific Coordination Unit, EO Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy.
Sabrina ZoraGeriatric Unit, Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, EO Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy.
Alberto PilottoGeriatric Unit, Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, EO Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy.
Filippo FimognariGeriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera di Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy.
SELFY-MPI SIGOT Investigators
Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · ITAULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana · ITAzienda Ospedaliera di Cosenza · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) is a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)-based tool that has shown excellent accuracy in predicting negative health outcomes in older people. Recently, the self-administered version of MPI (SELFY-MPI) has been validated in a community-dwelling sample, revealing excellent agreement with the original MPI. In the SELFY-MPI, Gijon's social-familial evaluation scale (SFES) was used to assess socio-relational and economic aspects. Completion of the SELFY-MPI, however, requires a significant amount of time in people aged over 60 years, particularly to fill in the SFES scale. The aim of this study was to validate, in a sample of community-dwelling older people, a short-form version of the SELFY-MPI (SELFY-MPI-SF), in which the SFES scale was replaced by the "co-habitation status" domain, as in the original version of the MPI.

methodsAll participants included in the study completed both versions of the self-administered MPI, which share the following seven domains: 1) basic and 2) instrumental activities of daily living, 3) mobility, 4) cognition, 5) nutrition, 6) comorbidity, and 7) number of medications. Moreover, in the SELFY-MPI-SF, the 8th domain "co-habitation status" (ie living alone, with family or in a residential facility) replaced the SFES scale. The Bland-Altman methodology was applied in order to measure the agreement between the two instruments. Finally, the time to complete the SFES scale and the question on co-habitation was measured.

resultsThe final study sample was composed of 129 participants (mean age=76.8 years, range=65-93 years, 64.3% women) were enrolled. The mean SELFY-MPI and SELFY-MPI-SF values were 0.221±0.196 and 0.246± 0.188, respectively. The mean difference was clinically irrelevant (-0.025±0.058). None of the 129 observations showed values outside the established 5% limits of agreement. The agreement between SELFY-MPI and SELFY-MPI-SF was excellent (k=0.762; rho=0.924, p<0.0001 for both). Stratified analyses of agreement among subgroups of participants of different ages did not show any significant differences between the two versions. Completion of the SFES required about 7 mins, on average, while the question on habitation status required about 10 s.

conclusionThe SELFY-MPI-SF showed strong agreement and precision when compared with the standard SELFY-MPI in people aged 65 and older and can therefore be successfully used as a quicker self-administered frailty instrument in community-dwelling older people.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionComorbidityFemaleFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentHumansIndependent LivingInterpersonal RelationsMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusPhysical Functional PerformancePolypharmacycomprehensive geriatric assessmentfrailtymultidimensional prognostic indexself assessment

Identifiers

PMID32280206
PMCPMC7125337
OpenAlexW3013105099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.