Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32280132›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Bioinformatics Analysis for Multiple Gene Expression Profiles in Sepsis.

Jianhua Zhai, Anlong Qi, Yan Zhang, Lina Jiao, Yancun Liu, Songtao Shou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Extracellular histones induce inflammation and senescence of vascular smooth muscle cells by activating the AMPK/FOXO4 signaling pathway.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jianhua ZhaiDepartment of Emergency, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Anlong QiDepartment of Emergency, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Yan ZhangDepartment of Emergency, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Lina JiaoDepartment of Emergency, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Yancun LiuDepartment of Emergency, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Songtao ShouDepartment of Emergency, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This work aimed to screen key biomarkers related to sepsis progression by bioinformatics analyses. MATERIAL AND METHODS The microarray datasets of blood and neutrophils from patients with sepsis or septic shock were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus database. Then, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from 4 groups (sepsis versus normal blood samples; septic shock versus normal blood samples; sepsis neutrophils versus normal controls and septic shock neutrophils versus controls) were respectively identified followed by functional analyses. Subsequently, protein-protein network was constructed, and key functional sub-modules were extracted. Finally, receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to evaluate diagnostic values of key genes. RESULTS There were 2082 DEGs between blood samples of sepsis patients and controls, 2079 DEGs between blood samples of septic shock patients and healthy individuals, 6590 DEGs between neutrophils from sepsis and controls, and 1056 DEGs between neutrophils from septic shock patients and normal controls. Functional analysis showed that numerous DEGs were significantly enriched in ribosome-related pathway, cell cycle, and neutrophil activation involved in immune response. In addition, TRIM25 and MYC acted as hub genes in protein-protein interaction (PPI) analyses of DEGs from microarray datasets of blood samples. Moreover, MYC (AUC=0.912) and TRIM25 (AUC=0.843) had great diagnostic values for discriminating septic shock blood samples and normal controls. RNF4 was a hub gene from PPI analyses based on datasets from neutrophils and RNF4 (AUC=0.909) was capable of distinguishing neutrophil samples from septic shock samples and controls. CONCLUSIONS Our findings identified several key genes and pathways related to sepsis development.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesHumansNeutrophilsNuclear ProteinsProtein Interaction MappingProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSepsisShock, SepticTranscription FactorsTranscriptomeTripartite Motif ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesBiomarkersMYC protein, humanNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRNF4 protein, humanTranscription FactorsTRIM25 protein, humanTripartite Motif ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID32280132
PMCPMC7171431
OpenAlexW3007974120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.