ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2020
Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success: Theory and Methods for Measuring Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships.
Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- A scoping review of Indigenous community-based research practices, guidelines, and ethical standards.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- 'You feel part of something bigger': Stakeholders' experiences of a long-term community-academic participatory research partnership.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2025Article
- Community Training Institute for Health Disparities: Outcomes of a Formal Opportunity for Community Capacity Building to Increase Health Equity in Southern Puerto Rico.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Characteristics of research review boards in the context of community-academic settings: A scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- The Ugandan youth public health ambassador program: a community-based public health initiative.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A short pragmatic tool for evaluating community engagement: Partnering for Health Improvement and Research Equity.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Determinants of perceived beneficial impact of a community-university partnership in an urban environment: a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Engage for equity plus: Transforming academic health centers to sustain patient/community engaged research structures, policies, and practices.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Community-Engaged Data Science (CEDS): A Case Study of Working with Communities to Use Data to Inform Change.Journal of community health · 2024Article
- Impact of a community-based participatory research project with underserved communities at risk for hepatitis C virus in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: an evaluation study.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- A CBPR-Enhanced Delphi Method: The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success Case Study.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2024Article
- Improving the equity landscape at U.S. academic institutions: 10 strategies to lead change.Equity in education & society · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a Participatory Action Project to Address Opioid Misuse: Breaking Down Barriers Through Partnership Processes.Gateways : international journal of community research & engagement · 2024Article
- Article
- Engaging Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) Communities for Health Research: Building and Sustaining PRIDEnet.Journal of community engagement and scholarship · 2024Article
- Translating community-based participatory research into broadscale sociopolitical change: insights from a coalition of women firefighters, scientists, and environmental health advocates.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023Article
- Principles to operationalize equity in cancer research and health outcomes: lessons learned from the cancer prevention and control research network.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Article
- Cultivating an Ecosystem: A Qualitative Exploration of Sustainability in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2023Article
- Race by Education Intersectional Differences in Exposure to Tobacco Advertisement in Baltimore City.Journal of lung health and diseases · 2023Article
- Transforming the field: the role of academic health centers in promoting and sustaining equity based community engaged research.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNumerous conceptual frameworks have been developed to understand how community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships function, and multiple measurement approaches have been designed to evaluate them. However, most measures are not validated, and have focused on new partnerships. To define and assess the meaning of success in long-standing CBPR partnerships, we are conducting a CBPR study, Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS). In this article we describe the theoretical underpinnings and methodological approaches used.
objectivesThe objectives of this study are to 1) develop a questionnaire to evaluate success in long-standing CBPR partnerships, 2) test the psychometric qualities of the questionnaire, 3) assess the relationships between key variables and refine the questionnaire and theoretical model, and 4) develop mechanisms and a feedback tool to apply partnership evaluation findings.
methodsMethodological approaches have included: engaged a community-academic national Expert Panel; conducted key informant interviews with Expert Panel; conducted a scoping literature review; conducted a Delphi process with the Expert Panel; and revised the measurement instrument. Additional methods include: conduct cognitive interviews and pilot testing; revise and test final version of the questionnaire with long-standing CBPR partnerships; examine the reliability and validity; analyze the relationship among variables in the framework; revise the framework; and develop a feedback mechanism for sharing partnership evaluation results.
conclusionsThrough the application of a theoretical model and multiple methodological approaches, the MAPS study will result in a validated measurement instrument and will develop procedures for effectively feeding back evaluation findings in order to strengthen authentic partnerships to achieve health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.