Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32279815›Full record

ArticleMaterials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications2020

Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity.

Kathryn M Moore, Elizabeth G Graham-Gurysh, Hunter N Bomba, Ananya B Murthy, Eric M Bachelder, Shawn D Hingtgen, Kristy M Ainslie

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Multimodal neuro-nanotechnology: Challenging the existing paradigm in glioblastoma therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn M MooreJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, USA.
Elizabeth G Graham-GuryshDivision of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Hunter N BombaDivision of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Ananya B MurthyDivision of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Eric M BachelderDivision of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Shawn D HingtgenDivision of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kristy M AinslieJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, USA; Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: ainsliek@email.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Nanofiber matrices to improve neural stem cell-mediated cancer therapyR01NS097507 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HINGTGEN, SHAWN · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
Combination Therapy of Stem Cells and Drug Eluting Scaffolds to Treat GlioblastomaF32CA225199 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GURYSH, ELIZABETH GRACE · 2019 to 2020
$133k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA225199NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) are an emerging therapy to combat glioblastoma (GBM). This therapy employs genetically engineered NSCs that secrete tumoricidal agents to seek out and kill tumor foci remaining after GBM surgical resection. Biomaterial scaffolds have previously been utilized to deliver NSCs to the resection cavity. Here, we investigated the impact of scaffold degradation rate on NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity. Composite acetalated dextran (Ace-DEX) gelatin electrospun scaffolds were fabricated with two distinct degradation profiles created by changing the ratio of cyclic to acyclic acetal coverage of Ace-DEX. In vitro, fast degrading scaffolds were fully degraded by one week, whereas slow degrading scaffolds had a half-life of >56 days. The scaffolds also retained distinct degradation profiles in vivo. Two different NSC lines readily adhered to and remained viable on Ace-DEX gelatin scaffolds, in vitro. Therapeutic NSCs secreting tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) had the same TRAIL output as tissue culture treated polystyrene (TCPS) when seeded on both scaffolds. Furthermore, secreted TRAIL was found to be highly potent against the human derived GBM cell line, GBM8, in vitro. Firefly luciferase expressing NSCs were seeded on scaffolds, implanted in a surgical resection cavity and their persistence in the brain was monitored by bioluminescent imaging (BLI). NSC loaded scaffolds were compared to a direct injection (DI) of NSCs in suspension, which is the current clinical approach to NSC therapy for GBM. Fast and slow degrading scaffolds enhanced NSC implantation efficiency 2.87 and 3.08-fold over DI, respectively. Interestingly, scaffold degradation profile did not significantly impact NSC persistence. However, persistence and long-term survival of NSCs was significantly greater for both scaffolds compared to DI, with scaffold implanted NSCs still detected by BLI at day 120 in most mice. Overall, these results highlight the benefit of utilizing a scaffold for application of tumoricidal NSC therapy for GBM.

Indexed as

AcetylationAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell LineCell SurvivalCross-Linking ReagentsDextransFemaleGelatinGlioblastomaMice, NudeNeural Stem CellsTemperatureTissue ScaffoldsCross-Linking ReagentsDextransGelatinAcetalated dextranElectrospinningGelatinTRAILTumoricidal neural stem cell therapy

Identifiers

PMID32279815
PMCPMC10350285
OpenAlexW3012316084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.