ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2020
A novel virtual flow diverter implantation method with realistic deployment mechanics and validated force response.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Flow Reduction Efficacy of Nominal and Oversized Flow Diverters Using a Novel Measurement-assisted in Silico Method.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Article
- A novel virtual flow diverter implantation method with realistic deployment mechanics and validated force response.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual flow diverter deployment techniques underwent significant development during the last couple of years. Each existing technique displays advantageous features, as well as significant limitations. One common drawback is the lack of quantitative validation of the mechanics of the device. In the following work, we present a new spring-mass-based method with validated mechanical responses that combines many of the useful capabilities of previous techniques. The structure of the virtual braids naturally incorporates the axial length changes as a function of the local expansion diameter. The force response of the model was calibrated using the measured response of real FDs. The mechanics of the model allows to replicate the expansion process during deployment, including additional effects such as the push-pull technique that is required for the deployment of braided FDs to achieve full opening and proper wall apposition. Furthermore, it is a computationally highly efficient solution that requires little pre-processing and has a run-time of a few seconds on a general laptop and thus allows for exploratory analyses. The model was applied in a patient-specific geometry, where corresponding accurate control measurements in a 3D-printed model were also available. The analysis shows the effects of FD oversizing and push-pull application on the radial expansion, surface density, and on the wall contact pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.