ArticleCurrent microbiology2020
Genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Poultry by Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR).
Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genotyping Based on CRISPR Loci Diversity and Pathogenic Potential of DiarrheagenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Whole-Genome Sequencing of Pathogenic Bacteria-New Insights into Antibiotic Resistance Spreading.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Diversity of International High-Risk Clones ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Distribution of CRISPR Types in Fluoroquinolone-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Genomic and Phenotypic Analysis of Multidrug-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Multidrug-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Campylobacter jejuni is the leading bacterial foodborne pathogen that causes human acute gastrointestinal illness worldwide. Due to its genetic diversity, fastidious growth and sophisticated biochemical requirements, classification of Campylobacter by traditional techniques is problematic. Several molecular typing methods have been explored in this bacterium. One such method is to use clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR). These CRISPRs consist of a direct repeat interspaced with nonrepetitive spacer sequences. In this study, we applied this genotyping method to explore the genetic diversity of C. jejuni isolated from poultry sources. Ninety-nine C. jejuni isolates from poultry environments in four different US states were used. Genomic DNA of the isolates were extracted from cultures using a commercial kit. PCR primers and conditions for CRISPR type 1 amplification were described previously. The amplicons were purified and sequenced by the Sanger dideoxy sequencing method. The direct repeats (DR) and spacers of the CRISPR sequences were identified using the CRISPRFinder. The results show there were 21% isolates no detectable, 30% isolates questionable, and 49% isolates confirmed CRISPR, respectively. The lengths of CRISPR range from 100 to 695 nucleotides. One type of DR was found in CRISPR of these isolates. The number of spacers in CRISPR ranges from 1 to 10 with various sequences. A total of 55 distinctive spacer sequences were identified in 78 isolates. Among them, 33 sequences were found unique in this study. In addition, the CRISPR genotyping had higher the Simpson's index of diversity value than that from flaA nucleotide typing. The results of our study show the CRISPR genotyping on C. jejuni may be complementary to the other genotyping methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.