SynthesisJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2020
Enabling pregnant women and their physicians to make informed medication decisions using artificial intelligence.
Synthesis in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence For 6P Medicine: Consolidating AI Needs of Predictive, Preventive, Personalized, Participatory, Precision, and Public Health Trajectories.Journal of medical systems · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for predicting and preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes addressing bias and clinical translation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Perinatal Care Pathways: A Scoping Review of Reviews of Applications, Outcomes, and Equity.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Leveraging artificial intelligence for collaborative care planning: Innovations and impacts in shared decision-making - A systematic review.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Review
- Automated approach for fetal and maternal health management using light gradient boosting model with SHAP explainable AI.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Four Markers Useful for the Distinction of Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Accelerating UN Sustainable Development Goals with AI-Driven Technologies: A Systematic Literature Review of Women's Healthcare.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Fetus Health Status Using Hybrid Deep Learning Algorithm (AlexNet-SVM) on Cardiotocographic Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular Disease Screening in Women: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools.Circulation research · 2022Review
- Impact of Big Data Analytics on People's Health: Overview of Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for Future Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Using Machine Learning to Predict Complications in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- A pharmacometrician's role in enhancing medication use in pregnancy and lactation.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2020Article
- Ideas for how informaticians can get involved with COVID-19 research.BioData mining · 2020Article
- Evidence integration: The transformative role of artificial intelligence in maternal health.Digital healthArticle
- Artificial intelligence: A rapid case for advancement in the personalization of Gynaecology/Obstetric and Mental Health care.Women's health (London, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare for pregnant women. To assess the role of AI in women's health, discover gaps, and discuss the future of AI in maternal health. A systematic review of English articles using EMBASE, PubMed, and SCOPUS. Search terms included pregnancy and AI. Research articles and book chapters were included, while conference papers, editorials and notes were excluded from the review. Included papers focused on pregnancy and AI methods, and pertained to pharmacologic interventions. We identified 376 distinct studies from our queries. A final set of 31 papers were included for the review. Included papers represented a variety of pregnancy concerns and multidisciplinary applications of AI. Few studies relate to pregnancy, AI, and pharmacologics and therefore, we review carefully those studies. External validation of models and techniques described in the studies is limited, impeding on generalizability of the studies. Our review describes how AI has been applied to address maternal health, throughout the pregnancy process: preconception, prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal health concerns. However, there is a lack of research applying AI methods to understand how pharmacologic treatments affect pregnancy. We identify three areas where AI methods could be used to improve our understanding of pharmacological effects of pregnancy, including: (a) obtaining sound and reliable data from clinical records (15 studies), (b) designing optimized animal experiments to validate specific hypotheses (1 study) to (c) implementing decision support systems that inform decision-making (11 studies). The largest literature gap that we identified is with regards to using AI methods to optimize translational studies between animals and humans for pregnancy-related drug exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.