ArticleThe American journal of case reports2020
Case Report of a Mediastinal Vascular Malformation Mimicking Esophageal Varices on Endoscopy, with Emphasis on Radiological Findings.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hiatal Hernia-Related Esophageal Varices Misdiagnosed as Cancer: Salvaged With Clipping.ACG case reports journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mediastinal vascular malformations are rare, and most patients are asymptomatic or present with unrelated symptoms. Imaging can be challenging to interpret, but plays an important role in diagnosis and prognostication. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 48-year-old man with history of intravenous drug abuse and incompletely treated pulmonary tuberculosis. A computed tomography (CT) scan done for respiratory symptoms showed an extensive soft-tissue mass in the mediastinum and upper abdomen, initially thought to represent tuberculous adenitis with possible esophageal involvement, which appeared variceal in nature on endoscopy. Further investigation with open mediastinal biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) eventually led to the diagnosis of a low-flow venous mediastinal vascular malformation. The patient responded well to conservative management, with the malformation remaining stable on follow-up CT up to a decade later. CONCLUSIONS Radiologists should be aware of the rare but important differential diagnosis of a vascular malformation, particularly when an extensive infiltrative calcified mediastinal soft-tissue mass is encountered. Multi-modality imaging, particularly MRI, which can demonstrate typical features, is crucial for diagnosis and prognostication, thereby avoiding unnecessary invasive procedures and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.