Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32278793›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2020

Stress in groups: Lessons from non-traditional rodent species and housing models.

Annaliese K Beery, Melissa M Holmes, Won Lee, James P Curley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. What's wrong with my experiment?: The impact of hidden variables on neuropsychopharmacology research.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Behavioural and physiological plasticity in social hierarchies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Shaping social behavior in an enriched environment.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Age-Related Individual Behavioural Characteristics of Adult Wistar Rats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  20. A Neuroscientist's Guide to the Vole.Current protocols · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Annaliese K BeeryDepartments of Psychology, Biology, and Program in Neuroscience, Smith College, Northampton, MA, United States. Electronic address: abeery@smith.edu.
Melissa M HolmesDepartments of Psychology, Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, and Cell & Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: melissa.holmes@utoronto.ca.
Won LeeDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: wl2433@columbia.edu.
James P CurleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States. Electronic address: curley@utexas.edu.
Columbia University · USSmith College · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Reward mechanisms supporting affiliation between peersR15MH113085 · NIMH · SMITH COLLEGE · PI BEERY, ANNALIESE K. · 2017 to 2017
$361k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH113085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major feature of life in groups is that individuals experience social stressors of varying intensity and type. Social stress can have profound effects on health, social behavior, and ongoing relationships. Relationships can also buffer the experience of exogenous stressors. Social stress has most commonly been investigated in dyadic contexts in mice and rats that produce intense stress. Here we review findings from studies of diverse rodents and non-traditional group housing paradigms, focusing on laboratory studies of mice and rats housed in visible burrow systems, prairie and meadow voles, and mole-rats. We argue that the use of methods informed by the natural ecology of rodent species provides novel insights into the relationship between social stress, behavior and physiology. In particular, we describe how this ethologically inspired approach reveals how individuals vary in their experience of and response to social stress, and how ecological and social contexts impact the effects of stress. Social stress induces adaptive changes, as well as long-term disruptive effects on behavior and physiology.

Indexed as

HousingRodentiaAnimalsArvicolinaeMiceSocial BehaviorStress, PsychologicalGroup housingMeadow volesMiceMole-RatsPrairie volesRatsSocial behaviorSocial bufferingSocial hierarchySocialityStressVisible burrow system

Identifiers

PMID32278793
PMCPMC7265712
OpenAlexW3016138830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.