Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32278755›Full record

ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2020

COVID-19 Guidance for Triage of Operations for Thoracic Malignancies: A Consensus Statement From Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network.

Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network, Inc, Mara Antonoff, Leah Backhus, Daniel J Boffa, Stephen R Broderick, Lisa M Brown, Phillip Carrott, James M Clark, David Cooke, Elizabeth David and 23 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. COVID-19 After Lung Resection in Northern Italy.Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022
    Article
  17. Commentary: Cardiac Surgery Cannot Wait in the Wings - The Show Must Go On.Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network, Inc
Mara Antonoff
Leah Backhus
Daniel J Boffa
Stephen R Broderick
Lisa M Brown
Phillip Carrott
James M Clark
David Cooke
Elizabeth David
Matt Facktor
Farhood Farjah
Eric Grogan
James Isbell
David R Jones
Biniam Kidane
Anthony W Kim
Shaf Keshavjee
Seth Krantz
Natalie Lui
Linda Martin
Robert A Meguid
Shari L Meyerson
Tim Mullett
Heidi Nelson
David D Odell
Joseph D Phillips
Varun Puri
Valerie Rusch
Lawrence Shulman
Thomas K Varghese
Elliot Wakeam
Douglas E Wood

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extraordinary demands of managing the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the world's ability to care for patients with thoracic malignancies. As a hospital's COVID-19 population increases and hospital resources are depleted, the ability to provide surgical care is progressively restricted, forcing surgeons to prioritize among their cancer populations. Representatives from multiple cancer, surgical, and research organizations have come together to provide a guide for triaging patients with thoracic malignancies as the impact of COVID-19 evolves as each hospital.

Indexed as

TriageBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansMedical OncologyPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Thoracic NeoplasmsThoracic SurgeryThoracic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID32278755
PMCPMC7146713
OpenAlexW3045106213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.