ReviewTrends in biotechnology2020
New Cognitive Neurotechnology Facilitates Studies of Cortical-Subcortical Interactions.
Review in Trends in biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurophysiological connectomic signatures of consciousness during propofol-induced general anesthesia.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Ethical imperatives in the commercialization of brain-computer interfaces.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Article
- Deep source transfer learning for the estimation of internal brain dynamics using scalp EEG.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Frequency-dependent white-matter functional network changes associated with cognitive deficits in subcortical vascular cognitive impairment.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Article
- The Future of Neurotoxicology: A Neuroelectrophysiological Viewpoint.Frontiers in toxicology · 2021Article
- Brain mapping of auditory steady-state responses: A broad view of cortical and subcortical sources.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Progress in Brain Computer Interface: Challenges and Opportunities.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Review
- Rich-club in the brain's macrostructure: Insights from graph theoretical analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most of the studies employing neuroimaging have focused on cortical and subcortical signals individually to obtain neurophysiological signatures of cognitive functions. However, understanding the dynamic communication between the cortex and subcortical structures is essential for unraveling the neural correlates of cognition. In this quest, magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) are the methods of choice because they are noninvasive electrophysiological recording techniques with high temporal resolution. Sophisticated MEG/EEG source estimation techniques and network analysis methods, developed recently, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms of fundamental cognitive processes. Used together with noninvasive modulation of cortical-subcortical communication, these approaches may open up new possibilities for expanding the repertoire of noninvasive cognitive neurotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.