Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32278352›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Effects and safety of the combination of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jinlong Zhao, Hetao Huang, Guihong Liang, Ling-Feng Zeng, Weiyi Yang, Jun Liu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04931719 (Comparing Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma), which is not on this map. Cited by 81 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
22.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04931719 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Comparing Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Combined With Different Hyaluronan for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.Ran2019 to 2020Enrolled95ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsPRP+Artz group, PRP+ HYAJOINT Plus group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinlong ZhaoThe Second School of clinical medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guagnzhou, 510405, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7079-1336
Hetao HuangThe Second School of clinical medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guagnzhou, 510405, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6197-1375
Guihong LiangThe Second School of clinical medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guagnzhou, 510405, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-2628
Ling-Feng ZengThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1311-8641
Weiyi YangThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8657-2269
Jun LiuThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China. liujun.gdtcm@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1943-3880
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

Key scientific research platforms and research projects of universities in Guangdong Province No. 2018KQNCX041Medical Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province No. B2019091Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China No. 2018M633036Project of Guangdong Provincial Department of Finance No.[2014]157, No.[2018]8the National Natural Science Foundation of China No.81873314, No.81974574, No. 81473698the Science and Technology Research Project of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine No.YN2019ML08, No. YK2013B2N19, YN2015MS15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have shown that the combined application of hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can repair degenerated cartilage and delay the progression of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of the intra-articular injection of PRP combined with HA compared with the intra-articular injection of PRP or HA alone in the treatment of KOA.

methodsThe PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched from inception to December 2019. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies of PRP combined with HA for KOA were included. Two orthopaedic surgeons conducted the literature retrieval and extracted the data. Outcome indicators included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), the Lequesne Index, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and adverse events (AEs). Review Manager 5.3 was used to calculate the relative risk (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) of the pooled data. STATA 14.0 was used for quantitative publication bias evaluation.

resultsSeven studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 2 cohort studies) with a total of 941 patients were included. In the VAS comparison after 6 months of follow-up, PRP combined with HA was more likely to reduce knee pain than PRP alone (SMD: - 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): - 0.55 to - 0.06; P = 0.01 < 0.05). PRP combined with HA for KOA achieved better improvements in the WOMAC Function Score (SMD: -0.32; 95% CI: - 0.54 to - 0.10; P < 0.05) and WOMAC Total Score (SMD: -0.42; 95% CI: - 0.67 to - 0.17; P < 0.05) at the 12-month follow-up than did the application of PRP alone. In a comparison of Lequesne Index scores at the 6-month follow-up, PRP combined with HA improved knee pain scores more than PRP alone (SMD: -0.42; 95% CI: - 0.67 to - 0.17; P < 0.05). In terms of AEs, PRP combined with HA was not significantly different from PRP or HA alone (P > 0.05).

conclusionsCompared with intra-articular injection of PRP alone, that of PRP combined with HA can improve the WOMAC Function Scores, WOMAC Total Score, 6-month follow-up VAS ratings, and Lequesne Index scores. However, in terms of the incidence of AEs, PRP combined with HA is not significantly different from PRP or HA alone.

Indexed as

Platelet-Rich PlasmaCombined Modality TherapyHumansHyaluronic AcidInjections, Intra-ArticularOsteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeViscosupplementsHyaluronic AcidViscosupplementsHyaluronic acidKnee osteoarthritisMeta-analysisPlatelet-rich plasma

Identifiers

PMID32278352
PMCPMC7149899
OpenAlexW3016097108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.