Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32278347›Full record

ArticleNutrition journal2020

Are dietary intake and nutritional status influenced by gender? The pattern of dietary intake in Lao PDR: a developing country.

Kethmany Ratsavong, Tessa van Elsacker, Daovieng Doungvichit, Latsamy Siengsounthone, Sengchanh Kounnavong, Dirk Essink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Black South Africans Who Migrate Away From Their Rural Homes and Their Chances of Having Abdominal Obesity.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nutrients · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review of dietary assessment studies conducted among Khmer populations living in Cambodia.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kethmany RatsavongLao Tropical and Public Health Institute (Lao TPHI), Vientiane, Laos. kethmany.ratsavong@gmail.com.
Tessa van ElsackerAthena Institute, Vrije University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Daovieng DoungvichitMinistry of Health, Vientiane, Laos.
Latsamy SiengsounthoneLao Tropical and Public Health Institute (Lao TPHI), Vientiane, Laos.
Sengchanh KounnavongLao Tropical and Public Health Institute (Lao TPHI), Vientiane, Laos.
Dirk EssinkAthena Institute, Vrije University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLMinistry of Health · LA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecognition of discrepancies between men and women in nutritional intake is important to tackle food and nutrition insecurity and the often-double burden of malnutrition. The purpose of this study was to assess nutritional status and dietary intake of the Lao population, with a focus on possible influences of gender.

methodsDietary intake was assessed in a national cross-sectional study of 1771 randomized participants aged from 1.01 to 89 years, using 24-h dietary recall. Dietary reference intakes were used to assess nutrient insufficiency. Chi-square test was used to evaluate gender differences and multiple univariate logistic regression to examine associations between gender, nutritional status, demographics and nutrient insufficiency.

resultsNutrient insufficiencies were higher among pregnant and lactating women than other adult men and women, especially for protein and micronutrients such as vitamin B3, B1, C and other vitamins. Dietary intake and BMI were similar between men and women; all had insufficient intake of all types of nutrients, except sodium. However, women had lower intake than men for almost all nutrients and age groups. The prevalence of overnutrition was higher among those aged 18 years and over for both sexes. Among adult women (15-49.9 years old) and older adult women (50 years old or above), the proportions were: underweight 8.6% (both groups), overweight 18.4 and 20.5%, and obese 34.2 and 39.1%, respectively. Among pregnant and lactating women, the rates of underweight were 7.5 and 1.4%, of overweight were 17.8 and 27.1%, and obese, 21.9 and 40.0%. Among adult and older men, 3.2 and 8.3% were underweight; 21.0 and 18.6% were overweight and 28.2 and 27.6% were obese. Multiple univariate logistic regressions revealed that the factors rural area, dry season and Northern-Lowland region were associated with inadequate micronutrient intake among children, adolescents and adults of both genders.

conclusionsDietary intakes were alarmingly micronutrient-insufficient. Macronutrient imbalance and double burden of malnutrition were confirmed in both sexes. Gender differences were limited; men and women had similarly insufficient intakes, but pregnant and lactating women were disproportionately affected. Nutritional interventions should also take men and older people into account to solve nutrition problems.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesDietDiet RecordsFemaleHumansInfantLaosMale24-h recallChildrenDietary adequacyDietary intakeGenderLao PDRWomen

Identifiers

PMID32278347
PMCPMC7151640
OpenAlexW3016132893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.