Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32278332›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2020

Oral shelling within an adaptive radiation of pupfishes: Testing the adaptive function of a novel nasal protrusion and behavioural preference.

Michelle E St John, Kristi E Dixon, Christopher H Martin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A vertebrate adaptive radiation is assembled from an ancient and disjunct spatiotemporal landscape.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle E St JohnDepartment of Integrative Biology and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Kristi E DixonDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Christopher H MartinDepartment of Integrative Biology and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7989-9124
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Discovery and functional analysis of novel candidate genes and variants underlying craniofacial diversification in Cyprinodon pupfishesR01DE027052 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Christopher Herbert Martin · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE027052We thank the University of California, Berkeley, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NSF CAREER 1749764, NIH 5R01DE027052-02 and BSF 2016136 for funding to CHM. We also thank Kelly Hogan for course-based undergraduate research (CURE) funding from the UNC Quality Enhancement Plan, in which this project was initiated by KD.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary specialization on hard prey items, such as mollusks and crustaceans, is commonly observed in a diverse array of fish species. Many fish consume these types of prey by crushing the shell to consume the soft tissue within, but a few fishes extricate the soft tissue without breaking the shell using a method known as oral shelling. Oral shelling involves pulling a mollusc from its shell and it may be a way to subvert an otherwise insurmountable shell defence. However, the biomechanical requirements and potential adaptations for oral shelling are unknown. Here, we test the hypothesis that a novel nasal protrusion is an adaptation for oral shelling in the durophagous pupfish (Cyprinodon brontotheroides). We first demonstrate oral shelling in this species and then predict that a larger nasal protrusion would allow pupfish to consume larger snails. Durophagous pupfish are found within an endemic radiation of pupfish on San Salvador Island, Bahamas. We took advantage of closely related sympatric species and outgroups to test: (a) whether durophagous pupfish shell and consume more snails than other species, (b) if F1 and F2 durophagous hybrids consume similar amounts of snails as purebred durophagous pupfish, and (c) if nasal protrusion size in parental and hybrid populations increases the maximum size of consumed snails. We found that durophagous pupfish and their hybrids consumed the most snails, but did not find a strong association between nasal protrusion size and maximum snail size consumed within the parental or F2 hybrid population, suggesting that the size of their novel nasal protrusion does not provide a major benefit in oral shelling. Instead, we suggest that the nasal protrusion may increase feeding efficiency, act as a sensory organ, or is a sexually selected trait, and that a strong feeding preference may be most important for oral shelling.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimal DistributionAnimalsBahamasFeeding BehaviorKillifishesSympatryadaptive radiationcraniofacialdurophagyforagingnoveltyperformancespeciation

Identifiers

PMID32278332
PMCPMC8183458
OpenAlexW3015281760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.