ArticleAquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2020
Semantic characterization of adverse outcome pathways.
Article in Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Pragmatic Approach to Adverse Outcome Pathway Development and Evaluation.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2021Article
- Review
- Knowledge Organization Systems for Systematic Chemical Assessments.Environmental health perspectives · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study was undertaken to systematically assess the utilities and performance of ontology-based semantic analysis in adverse outcome pathway (AOP) research. With an increasing number of AOPs developed by scientific domain experts to organize toxicity information and facilitate chemical risk assessment, there is a pressing need for objective approaches to evaluate the biological coherence and quality of these AOPs. Powered by ontologies covering a wide range of biological domains, abundant phenotypic data annotated ontologically, and some sophisticated knowledge computing tools, semantic analysis has great potential in this area of application. With the events in the AOP-Wiki first annotated into logical definitions and then grouped into phenotypic profiles by individual AOPs, the coherence and quality of AOPs were assessed at several levels: paired key event relationships (KER), all possible event pair combinations within AOPs, and the phenotypic profiles of AOPs, genes, biological pathways, human diseases, and selected chemicals. The semantic similarities were assessed at all these levels based on a unified cross-species vertebrate phenotype ontology encompassing the logical definitions of AOP events as well as many other domain ontologies. A substantial number of KERs and AOPs in the AOP-Wiki were found to be semantically coherent. These same coherent AOPs also mapped to many more genes, pathways, and diseases biologically aligned with the intended chain of events therein leading to their respective adverse outcomes. Significantly, these findings imply that semantic analysis should also have utilities in developing future AOPs by selecting candidate events from either the existing AOP-Wiki events or a broader collection of ontology terms semantically similar to the molecular initiating events or adverse outcomes of interest. In addition, semantic analysis enabled AOP networks to be constructed at the level of phenotypic profiles based on similarities, complementing those based on event sharing by bringing genes, pathways, diseases, and chemicals into the networks too-thus greatly expanding the biological scope and our understanding of AOPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.