Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32278091›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Comparison of beamformer implementations for MEG source localization.

Amit Jaiswal, Jukka Nenonen, Matti Stenroos, Alexandre Gramfort, Sarang S Dalal, Britta U Westner, Vladimir Litvak, John C Mosher, Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen, Caroline Witton and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Spatial Filters-In Search of the Virtual Electrode.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Wearable Magnetoencephalography in a Lightly Shielded Environment.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Joint estimation of source dynamics and interactions from MEG data.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amit JaiswalMegin Oy, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland. Electronic address: amit.jaiswal@megin.fi.
Jukka NenonenMegin Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
Matti StenroosDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
Alexandre GramfortUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.
Sarang S DalalCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Britta U WestnerCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Vladimir LitvakThe Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
John C MosherDepartment of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Jan-Mathijs SchoffelenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Caroline WittonAston Brain Centre, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Robert OostenveldDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; NatMEG, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lauri ParkkonenMegin Oy, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beamformers are applied for estimating spatiotemporal characteristics of neuronal sources underlying measured MEG/EEG signals. Several MEG analysis toolboxes include an implementation of a linearly constrained minimum-variance (LCMV) beamformer. However, differences in implementations and in their results complicate the selection and application of beamformers and may hinder their wider adoption in research and clinical use. Additionally, combinations of different MEG sensor types (such as magnetometers and planar gradiometers) and application of preprocessing methods for interference suppression, such as signal space separation (SSS), can affect the results in different ways for different implementations. So far, a systematic evaluation of the different implementations has not been performed. Here, we compared the localization performance of the LCMV beamformer pipelines in four widely used open-source toolboxes (MNE-Python, FieldTrip, DAiSS (SPM12), and Brainstorm) using datasets both with and without SSS interference suppression. We analyzed MEG data that were i) simulated, ii) recorded from a static and moving phantom, and iii) recorded from a healthy volunteer receiving auditory, visual, and somatosensory stimulation. We also investigated the effects of SSS and the combination of the magnetometer and gradiometer signals. We quantified how localization error and point-spread volume vary with the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in all four toolboxes. When applied carefully to MEG data with a typical SNR (3-15 ​dB), all four toolboxes localized the sources reliably; however, they differed in their sensitivity to preprocessing parameters. As expected, localizations were highly unreliable at very low SNR, but we found high localization error also at very high SNRs for the first three toolboxes while Brainstorm showed greater robustness but with lower spatial resolution. We also found that the SNR improvement offered by SSS led to more accurate localization.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexComputer SimulationElectroencephalographyHumansMagnetoencephalographyPhantoms, ImagingPhysical StimulationReproducibility of ResultsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBeamformersEEGLCMVMEGOpen-source analysis toolboxesSource modeling

Identifiers

PMID32278091
PMCPMC7322560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.