ReviewNeuroscience2021
The Unexplored Territory of Neural Models: Potential Guides for Exploring the Function of Metabotropic Neuromodulation.
Review in Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Python/NEURON code for simulating biophysically realistic thalamocortical dynamics during sleep.Software impacts · 2024Article
- Gated transformations from egocentric to allocentric reference frames involving retrosplenial cortex, entorhinal cortex, and hippocampus.Hippocampus · 2023Review
- Glioma‑neuronal interactions in tumor progression: Mechanism, therapeutic strategies and perspectives (Review).International journal of oncology · 2022Review
- Distinct burst properties contribute to the functional diversity of thalamic nuclei.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2021Article
- Metabotropic Regulation of Synaptic Plasticity.Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Learning an Efficient Hippocampal Place Map from Entorhinal Inputs Using Non-Negative Sparse Coding.eNeuroArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The space of possible neural models is enormous and under-explored. Single cell computational neuroscience models account for a range of dynamical properties of membrane potential, but typically do not address network function. In contrast, most models focused on network function address the dimensions of excitatory weight matrices and firing thresholds without addressing the complexities of metabotropic receptor effects on intrinsic properties. There are many under-explored dimensions of neural parameter space, and the field needs a framework for representing what has been explored and what has not. Possible frameworks include maps of parameter spaces, or efforts to categorize the fundamental elements and molecules of neural circuit function. Here we review dimensions that are under-explored in network models that include the metabotropic modulation of synaptic plasticity and presynaptic inhibition, spike frequency adaptation due to calcium-dependent potassium currents, and afterdepolarization due to calcium-sensitive non-specific cation currents and hyperpolarization activated cation currents. Neuroscience research should more effectively explore possible functional models incorporating under-explored dimensions of neural function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.