ArticleUrology2020
A 17-Gene Panel Genomic Prostate Score Has Similar Predictive Accuracy for Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in African American and European American Men.
Article in Urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of 17-Gene genomic prostate score in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of genomic testing on urologists' treatment preference in favorable risk prostate cancer: A randomized trial.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Integration of Genomic Tests in Prostate Cancer Care: Implications for Clinical Practice and Patient Outcomes.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Aquaporins as Prognostic Biomarker in Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
- Tissue- and Liquid-Based Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Blood-Derived Biomarkers of Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy Response in Prostate Cancer Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Molecular tracing of prostate cancer lethality.Oncogene · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo validate the 17-gene Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) as a predictor of adverse pathology (AP) in African American (AA) men and to assess the distribution of GPS in AA and European American (EA) men with localized prostate cancer.
methodsThe study populations were derived from 2 multi-institutional observational studies. Between February 2009 and September 2014, AA and EA men who elected immediate radical prostatectomy after a ≥10-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy were included in the study. Logistic regressions, area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC), calibration curves, and predictive values were used to compare the accuracy of GPS. AP was defined as primary Gleason grade 4, presence of any Gleason pattern 5, and/or non-organ-confined disease (≥pT3aN0M0) at radical prostatectomy.
resultsOverall, 96 AA and 76 EA men were selected and 46 (26.7%) had AP. GPS result was a significant predictor of AP (odds ratio per 20 GPS units [OR/20 units] in AA: 4.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-11.5, P = .001; and EA: 4.88; 95% CI 1.8-13.5, P = .002). On multivariate analysis, there was no significant interaction between GPS and race (P >.10). GPS remained significant in models adjusted for either National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group or Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score. In race-stratified models, area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for GPS/20 units was 0.69 for AAs vs 0.74 for EAs (P = .79). The GPS distributions were not statistically different by race (all P >.05).
conclusionIn this clinical validation study, the Oncotype DX GPS is an independent predictor of AP at prostatectomy in AA and EA men with similar predictive accuracy and distributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.