Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32277867›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2020

Measuring Advanced/Extended Practice Roles in Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Care in Canada.

Katie Lundon, Taucha Inrig, Morag Paton, Rachel Shupak, Carol Kennedy, Mandy McGlynn, Claire Barber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Commentary on Matifat et al.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2024
    Article
  7. The Future is Now for Advanced Practice Physiotherapy in Canada.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katie LundonUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1796-7528
Taucha InrigSt. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1651-6605
Morag PatonUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9934-9784
Rachel ShupakSt. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9028-5238
Carol KennedySt. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8948-5662
Mandy McGlynnToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0286-0114
Claire BarberCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3062-5488
St. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur objective was to characterize Canadian workforce attributes of extended role practitioners (ERPs) in arthritis care.

methodsWe used an exploratory, mixed-methods study that was based on the Canadian Rheumatology Association's Stand Up and Be Counted Rheumatologist Workforce Survey (2015). An anonymous online survey was deployed to groups of non-physician health care professionals across Canada who potentially had post-licensure training in arthritis care. Demographic and practice information were elicited. Qualitative responses were analyzed using grounded theory techniques.

resultsOf 141 respondents, 91 identified as practicing in extended role capacities. The mean age of ERP respondents was 48.7; 87% were female, and 41% of ERPs planned to retire within 5 to 10 years. Respondents were largely physical or occupational therapists by profession and practiced in urban/academic (46%), community (39%), and rural settings (13%). Differences in practice patterns were noted between ERPs (64.5%) and non-ERPs (34.5%), with more ERPs working in extended role capacities while retaining activities reflective of their professional backgrounds. Most respondents (95%) agreed that formal training is necessary to work as an ERP, but only half perceived they had sufficient training opportunities. Barriers to pursuing training were varied, including personal barriers, geographic barriers, patient-care needs, and financial/remuneration concerns.

conclusionTo our knowledge, no previous studies have assessed the workforce capacity or the perceived need for the training of ERPs working in arthritis and musculoskeletal care. Measurement is important because in these health disciplines, practitioners' scopes of practice evolve, and ERPs integrate into the Canadian health care system. ERPs have emerged to augment provision of arthritis care, but funding for continuing professional development opportunities and for role implementation remains tenuous.

Identifiers

PMID32277867
PMCPMC7164630
OpenAlexW3016160932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.