Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32277696›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2020

Does Size Matter? Mate Choice in Two Lekking Flies.

Marco Tulio Tejeda, José Arredondo, Francisco Díaz-Fleischer, Diana Pérez-Staples

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mate Selection onInsects · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marco Tulio TejedaSubdirección de Filtrado Genético, Programa Operativo Moscamed Acuerdo Sader-IICA. Planta Moscamed, Chiapas, México.
José ArredondoDepartamento de Biología, Ecología y Comportamiento, Desarrollo de métodos, Programa Moscafrut (SADER-SENASICA), Camino a los Cacaotales S/N, Chiapas, México.
Francisco Díaz-FleischerINBIOTECA, Universidad Veracruzana. Veracruz, México.
Diana Pérez-StaplesSubdirección de Filtrado Genético, Programa Operativo Moscamed Acuerdo Sader-IICA. Planta Moscamed, Chiapas, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For insect pests controlled through the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT), which consists in the mass production, sterilization, and release of target insects into affected areas, sterile male mating success with wild females is the key that will reduce population levels in the next generation. Male size is assumed to be important for mating success, but often without any concrete evidence or confounded by other parameters. Here, we evaluated male size and its interaction with male origin (laboratory or wild) on female choice for two lekking species controlled through SIT, Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) and Anastrepha ludens (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae). In field cages, we tested wild females mating with: large wild males competing against small wild males; large wild males against small laboratory-sterile males; and large laboratory-sterile males against small wild males. We found evidence of large male advantage for A. obliqua but no effect of male size on mating competitiveness for A. ludens. For A. obliqua large wild males had a greater mating success over small laboratory males, yet large laboratory males secured a similar amount of copulations than small wild males. For A. ludens, there was no effect of male size on mating success. We discuss why A. obliqua is sensitive to size and origin while no effect was seen in A. ludens. SIT programs should not assume that male mating success is dependent on a large size. Alternatively, when an advantage exists for large males, mass-rearing programs should stride to produce and release large males.

Indexed as

Mating Preference, AnimalAnimalsBody SizeFemaleMaleSpecies SpecificityTephritidaefemale choiceleksterile insect techniqueTephritidae

Identifiers

PMID32277696
PMCPMC7136004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.