ArticleMedical physics2020
Automated glioma grading on conventional MRI images using deep convolutional neural networks.
Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based segmentation, grading and genotype classification of glioma: a literature analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- Multimodal imaging and AI in brain tumor surgery: current tools and emerging integration.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Hybrid classical and quantum computing for enhanced glioma tumor classification using TCGA data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Layer by Layer: Assessing AI Diagnostic Accuracy With Incremental Case Information in Neuroradiology.Cureus · 2025Article
- Performance Evaluation of a Custom-Designed Contrast Media Injector in a 5-Tesla MRI Environment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Feasibility study of AI-assisted multi-parameter MRI diagnosis of prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A deep ensemble learning framework for glioma segmentation and grading prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting survival in malignant glioma using artificial intelligence.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Beyond visual inspection: the deep learning revolution in quantitative cerebrovascular imaging.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Article
- Brain tumor intelligent diagnosis based on Auto-Encoder and U-Net feature extraction.PloS one · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning for predicting subtypes of glioma.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Enhancing brain tumor classification through ensemble attention mechanism.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Preoperative prediction of rectal Cancer staging combining MRI deep transfer learning, radiomics features, and clinical factors: accurate differentiation from stage T2 to T3.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- A data-centric machine learning approach to improve prediction of glioma grades using low-imbalance TCGA data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predicting treatment response in multicenter non-small cell lung cancer patients based on federated learning.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- IMPA-Net: Interpretable Multi-Part Attention Network for Trustworthy Brain Tumor Classification from MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Imaging for Predicting High-risk Molecular Markers of Gliomas.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Review
- Advances in the Use of Deep Learning for the Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Image in Neuro-Oncology.Cancers · 2024Review
- Identification of biological indicators for human exposure toxicology in smart cities based on public health data and deep learning.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeGliomas are the most common primary tumor of the brain and are classified into grades I-IV of the World Health Organization (WHO), based on their invasively histological appearance. Gliomas grading plays an important role to determine the treatment plan and prognosis prediction. In this study we propose two novel methods for automatic, non-invasively distinguishing low-grade (Grades II and III) glioma (LGG) and high-grade (grade IV) glioma (HGG) on conventional MRI images by using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs).
methodsAll MRI images have been preprocessed first by rigid image registration and intensity inhomogeneity correction. Both proposed methods consist of two steps: (a) three-dimensional (3D) brain tumor segmentation based on a modification of the popular U-Net model; (b) tumor classification on segmented brain tumor. In the first method, the slice with largest area of tumor is determined and the state-of-the-art mask R-CNN model is employed for tumor grading. To improve the performance of the grading model, a two-dimensional (2D) data augmentation has been implemented to increase both the amount and the diversity of the training images. In the second method, denoted as 3DConvNet, a 3D volumetric CNNs is applied directly on bounding image regions of segmented tumor for classification, which can fully leverage the 3D spatial contextual information of volumetric image data.
resultsThe proposed schemes were evaluated on The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) low grade glioma (LGG) data, and the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation (BraTS) Benchmark 2018 training datasets with fivefold cross validation. All data are divided into training, validation, and test sets. Based on biopsy-proven ground truth, the performance metrics of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are measured on the test sets. The results are 0.935 (sensitivity), 0.972 (specificity), and 0.963 (accuracy) for the 2D Mask R-CNN based method, and 0.947 (sensitivity), 0.968 (specificity), and 0.971 (accuracy) for the 3DConvNet method, respectively. In regard to efficiency, for 3D brain tumor segmentation, the program takes around ten and a half hours for training with 300 epochs on BraTS 2018 dataset and takes only around 50 s for testing of a typical image with a size of 160 × 216 × 176. For 2D Mask R-CNN based tumor grading, the program takes around 4 h for training with around 60 000 iterations, and around 1 s for testing of a 2D slice image with size of 128 × 128. For 3DConvNet based tumor grading, the program takes around 2 h for training with 10 000 iterations, and 0.25 s for testing of a 3D cropped image with size of 64 × 64 × 64, using a DELL PRECISION Tower T7910, with two NVIDIA Titan Xp GPUs.
conclusionsTwo effective glioma grading methods on conventional MRI images using deep convolutional neural networks have been developed. Our methods are fully automated without manual specification of region-of-interests and selection of slices for model training, which are common in traditional machine learning based brain tumor grading methods. This methodology may play a crucial role in selecting effective treatment options and survival predictions without the need for surgical biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.