Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32277478›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2020

Automated glioma grading on conventional MRI images using deep convolutional neural networks.

Ying Zhuge, Holly Ning, Peter Mathen, Jason Y Cheng, Andra V Krauze, Kevin Camphausen, Robert W Miller

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ying ZhugeRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Holly NingRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Peter MathenRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Jason Y ChengRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Andra V KrauzeDivision of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Radiotherapeutics, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kevin CamphausenRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Robert W MillerRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.

Funding

Pre-clinical Development of Radiation Sensitizers for Patients with GlioblastomaZIASC010372 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI CAMPHAUSEN, KEVIN · 2009 to 2025
$12.0M
Radiation Field Modeling and Computerized Treatment PlanningZIASC006330 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI MILLER, ROBERT · 2009 to 2025
$3.0M
Radiation Field Modeling/Computerized Treatment PlanningZ01SC006330 · SC · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI MILLER, ROBERT W · 1996 to 2008
$551k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 SC006330Intramural NIH HHS ZIA SC010372NCI NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGliomas are the most common primary tumor of the brain and are classified into grades I-IV of the World Health Organization (WHO), based on their invasively histological appearance. Gliomas grading plays an important role to determine the treatment plan and prognosis prediction. In this study we propose two novel methods for automatic, non-invasively distinguishing low-grade (Grades II and III) glioma (LGG) and high-grade (grade IV) glioma (HGG) on conventional MRI images by using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs).

methodsAll MRI images have been preprocessed first by rigid image registration and intensity inhomogeneity correction. Both proposed methods consist of two steps: (a) three-dimensional (3D) brain tumor segmentation based on a modification of the popular U-Net model; (b) tumor classification on segmented brain tumor. In the first method, the slice with largest area of tumor is determined and the state-of-the-art mask R-CNN model is employed for tumor grading. To improve the performance of the grading model, a two-dimensional (2D) data augmentation has been implemented to increase both the amount and the diversity of the training images. In the second method, denoted as 3DConvNet, a 3D volumetric CNNs is applied directly on bounding image regions of segmented tumor for classification, which can fully leverage the 3D spatial contextual information of volumetric image data.

resultsThe proposed schemes were evaluated on The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) low grade glioma (LGG) data, and the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation (BraTS) Benchmark 2018 training datasets with fivefold cross validation. All data are divided into training, validation, and test sets. Based on biopsy-proven ground truth, the performance metrics of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are measured on the test sets. The results are 0.935 (sensitivity), 0.972 (specificity), and 0.963 (accuracy) for the 2D Mask R-CNN based method, and 0.947 (sensitivity), 0.968 (specificity), and 0.971 (accuracy) for the 3DConvNet method, respectively. In regard to efficiency, for 3D brain tumor segmentation, the program takes around ten and a half hours for training with 300 epochs on BraTS 2018 dataset and takes only around 50 s for testing of a typical image with a size of 160 × 216 × 176. For 2D Mask R-CNN based tumor grading, the program takes around 4 h for training with around 60 000 iterations, and around 1 s for testing of a 2D slice image with size of 128 × 128. For 3DConvNet based tumor grading, the program takes around 2 h for training with 10 000 iterations, and 0.25 s for testing of a 3D cropped image with size of 64 × 64 × 64, using a DELL PRECISION Tower T7910, with two NVIDIA Titan Xp GPUs.

conclusionsTwo effective glioma grading methods on conventional MRI images using deep convolutional neural networks have been developed. Our methods are fully automated without manual specification of region-of-interests and selection of slices for model training, which are common in traditional machine learning based brain tumor grading methods. This methodology may play a crucial role in selecting effective treatment options and survival predictions without the need for surgical biopsy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, Computerbrain tumorconvolutional neural networksdeep learningGlioma gradingMRI image

Identifiers

PMID32277478
PMCPMC8494136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.