Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32277399›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2021

Robotic-assisted repair of complex ventral hernia: can it pay off?

Bernhard Dauser, Nikolaus Hartig, Mariam Vedadinejad, Elisabeth Kirchner, Florian Trummer, Friedrich Herbst

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair - a detailed economic evaluation: is it worth it?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Outcomes of open versus robotic preperitoneal ventral hernia repair: a propensity-matched analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Costing methodologies in robotic ventral hernia repair: a scoping review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Robotic Surgical Procedures for Ventral Hernia Repair.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bernhard DauserDepartment of Surgery, St John of God Hospital, Johannes von Gott Platz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria. bernhard.dauser@bbwien.at.
Nikolaus HartigDepartment of Surgery, St John of God Hospital, Johannes von Gott Platz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria.
Mariam VedadinejadDepartment of Surgery, St John of God Hospital, Johannes von Gott Platz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria.
Elisabeth KirchnerDepartment of Gynecology, St John of God Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Florian TrummerDepartment of Surgery, St John of God Hospital, Johannes von Gott Platz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria.
Friedrich HerbstDepartment of Surgery, St John of God Hospital, Johannes von Gott Platz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pressure on health care providers is growing due to capping of remuneration for medical services in most Western European countries. We wanted to investigate, if robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair is reasonable from an economic point of view in our setting. Patients undergoing open or robotic-assisted repair for complex abdominal wall hernia using a Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) between September 2017 and January 2019 were included. Procedure-related costs were calculated exact to the minute and cost unit accounting for the postoperative in-patient stay was done. Abdominal wall reconstruction using the TAR-technique was done in a total of 26 (10 female) patients via an open (n = 10) or robotic-assisted (n = 16) approach. No significant difference was seen in regard to age, BMI and ASA scores between subgroups. Time for operation was longer (253.5 vs 211.5 min; p = 0.0322), while postoperative hospital stay was shorter for patients operated with a robotic-assisted approach (4.5 vs 12.5 days; p < 0.005). Procedure-related costs were 2.7-fold higher when a robotic-assisted reconstruction was done (EUR 5397 vs. 1989), while total costs for in-patient stay were about 60% lower (EUR 2715 vs 6663). Currently, revenues by national insurance account for a total of EUR 9577 leading to a profit of EUR 1465 and 925 for the robotic-assisted and open myofascial release, respectively. In addition, 30-day re-admission rate was in favor of the robotic-assisted approach as well (6.3% vs 20%). From an economic point of view, robotic-assisted TAR for complex ventral hernia repair is a viable option in our setting. Higher procedure-related costs are offset by a significant shorter hospital stay. The economic advantage goes along with improvement in outcome of patients.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAbdominal MusclesAgedCost SavingsFemaleHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansLength of StayMaleOperative TimePatient ReadmissionPlastic Surgery ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeCostsRobotic-assistedVentral hernia repair

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.