Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32277310›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2020

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2019 end of year summary: monitoring tissue oxygenation and perfusion and its autoregulation.

M M Sahinovic, J J Vos, T W L Scheeren

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M M SahinovicDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30001, 9700RB, Groningen, Netherlands.
J J VosDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30001, 9700RB, Groningen, Netherlands.
T W L ScheerenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30001, 9700RB, Groningen, Netherlands. t.w.l.scheeren@umcg.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue perfusion monitoring is increasingly being employed clinically in a non-invasive fashion. In this end-of-year summary of the Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, we take a closer look at the papers published recently on this subject in the journal. Most of these papers focus on monitoring cerebral perfusion (and associated hemodynamics), using either transcranial doppler measurements or near-infrared spectroscopy. Given the importance of cerebral autoregulation in the analyses performed in most of the studies discussed here, this end-of-year summary also includes a short description of cerebral hemodynamic physiology and its autoregulation. Finally, we review articles on somatic tissue oxygenation and its possible association with outcome.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood Flow VelocityBrainBrain InjuriesCerebrovascular CirculationHemodynamicsHomeostasisHumansOximetryOxygenOxygen ConsumptionPerfusionSevofluraneSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredSubarachnoid HemorrhageUltrasonography, DopplerOxygenSevofluraneCerebral autoregulationCerebral blood flowCerebral tissue oxygenationMonitoringNIRSSomatic tissue oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID32277310
PMCPMC7205776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.